期刊文献+

交通事故责任书不能直接确认交通肇事罪——以交通事故当事人逃逸刑事责任认定为切入 被引量:8

Road Accident Responsibility Book Can not Directly Determine Traffic Accident Crime——On View of the Confirmation of Criminal Responsibility for the Escaping Party during the Traffic Accident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在交通事故处理中,公安交警部门制作的交通事故责任书对事故当事人的刑事责任的认定具有重大的影响意义。但是由于在交通事故责任书中存在着一定程度的司法推定,刑事法官不能将其作为确认交通肇事罪的直接依据,当事人的违章和事故之间有无因果关系必须查清,这一点对于交通事故后当事人逃逸的刑事责任的认定来讲尤为如此。 For the handling of road accident, the road responsibility book made by traffic police branch of public security department has important effect to confirmation of criminal responsibility of accident interested party. But there exists certain degree judiciary deduce in the road accident responsibility, the criminal judge can not look on it as the direct basis affirming traffic accident crime. Causal relationship between personnel' s breaking rules and regulations and accident must be made clear by investigation, which is especially important to the determination of criminal responsibility for the escaping party.
作者 王立志
出处 《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》 2008年第1期181-185,共5页 Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 交通事故责任书 交通肇事罪 司法推定 因果关系 刑事责任 road accident responsibility book traffic accident crime the judiciary deduce causal relationship criminal liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

共引文献89

同被引文献34

引证文献8

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部