期刊文献+

美国成年人监护法的改革及对我国未来民法典之借鉴意义 被引量:3

Adult guardianship reform in American law and its benefits to our future Civil law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 改革前的美国成年人监护法,侧重保护交易安全,维护社会利益。设置监护后,行为能力被全面剥夺或受限成为当然结果。自六十年代起,美国的学者们对成年人监护制度进行了深刻的反思,改革后的成年人监护法即是这种一流智慧的积淀。在认定欠缺能力需要设置监护后对欠缺能力者的行为能力范围进行预先宣告,力图做到宣告的行为能力与被宣告者实际的行为能力相一致。从"全面监护"到"有限监护"可以用来描述美国改革所取得之成果。从"抽象的人"到"具体的人",作为近代民法过渡到现代民法之本质表现,也可以用来描述美国改革所取得之成果。美国改革的上述经验,对我国具有重要的借鉴意义! Adult guardianship in American law before its reform tries to protect the security of transaction in order to safeguard the interests of society. Once the guardianship was set up, the adult in guardianship lost the freedom to act in all or most aspacts. In fact, law scholars in America have studied adult guardianship since 1960s and the achievements they have got possess the dominant position in this field. Adult guardianship reform in American law just concentrates their wisdom. Nowadays a court which once decides that an incapacitated adult needs protection through guardianship will proclaim the scope of his legal capacity and will try its best to make what it has proclaimed fit the real situation of that incapacitated adult. From plenary guardianship to limited guardianship can describe precisely what adult guardianship in American law has achieved through its reform. From abstract person to concrete person which essentially demonstrates the changes of Civil law from recent times to modem times, I believe, can also describe the achievements of Adult guardianship reform in American law. Studying the Adult guardianship reform in American law in order that our future civil law can benefit from it, is the purpose of this text.
作者 李文胜
机构地区 宁波大学法学院
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2008年第1期112-116,F0003,共6页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 正常化 自我决定权 有限监护 normalization the right to decide by oneself limited guardianship
  • 相关文献

同被引文献66

  • 1孙海涛,曹希增.论美国成年人公共监护与社会机构监护制度[J].江南社会学院学报,2009,11(3):76-80. 被引量:4
  • 2白绿铉.日本修改成年人监护法律制度动态[J].法学杂志,1999,20(3):45-46. 被引量:35
  • 3马忆南.成年监护制度与残障人士权益保护——以民法视角观察[J].残疾人研究,2012(4):8-12. 被引量:7
  • 4刘德宽.《新成年监护制度之检讨》[J].法学丛刊,1997,(2).
  • 5林秀雄.《论我国新修正之成年监护制度》[J].月旦法学杂志,2009,(1).
  • 6Wolf Wolfensberger and Stephen Tullman,A Brief Outline of the Principle of Normalization,27(3)Rehabilitation Psychology(1982),p.135.
  • 7申政武.《东北亚成年监护国际研讨会发言稿》,杭州师范大学2012年4月28日《东北亚成年监护制度国际会议论文集》(未公开发表).
  • 8The Ireland Law Reform Commission Consultation Paper on Law and the Elderly(LRC CP23-2003).
  • 9The Ireland Law Reform Commission Consultation Paper on Vulnerable Adults and Law:Capacity(LRC CP23-2003).
  • 10Christy Holmes,Surrogate Decision-making in the 90’s:Learning to Respect Our Elders,28 University of Toledo Law Review 605(1997).

引证文献3

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部