期刊文献+

诚实信用原则可以直接作为裁判的依据吗?——与梁慧星先生商榷 被引量:2

Could the principle of good faith act as the direct foundation of judication?——Discussion with Professor Liang Huixing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以诚实信用原则进行漏洞补充时,裁判的依据不是诚实信用原则本身,而是补充法律漏洞时所创造的具体规范,否则会存在多重的自相矛盾。直接适用说曲解了授权条款的含义,混淆了裁判权源与造法权源,误将方法当成了内容。直接适用说,不利于法律思维能力的训练,还加剧了我国传统思维缺陷对中国法律人的法律思维能力的干扰作用。 In the supplement of legal holes through the principle of good faith, the judgement justifies not in the priciple itself, but in the new concrete fomulation from the supplement, eitherwise, there will be sevseal contradictions. The doctrin of direct application misunderstants the implication of authorization clause, confuses the empowerment of judication and formulation, and misuses the method as contents. It is disadvantageous with cultivation of the ablitity of law thinking and exacerbates the disturbance on the ablitity of law thinking of chinese legal persons from the flaws of thaditional thinking.
作者 许军
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2008年第1期117-120,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 诚实信用原则 漏洞补充 授权条款 法律思维 the principle of good faith legal supplement of holes authorization clause law thinking
  • 相关文献

同被引文献6

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部