期刊文献+

吡哌酸滴丸与氯霉素滴耳液治疗化脓性中耳炎的比较

Pipemidic acid pills vs chloramphenicol ear drops in treating suppurative otitis media
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较吡哌酸滴丸与氯霉素滴耳液治疗化脓性中耳炎的疗效。方法:化脓性中耳炎30例(男性19例,女性11例;年龄32±s17a),用吡哌酸滴丸1~2丸放至鼓膜穿孔处,每日换药1次;同期用氯霉素滴耳液治疗29例作对照,疗程均14d。结果:吡哌酸滴丸组和氯霉素滴耳液组总有效率分别为93%和70%(P<0.05),治愈天数分别为5.6±2.8d和12.0±2.8d(P<0.01)。细菌清除率分别为62%和28%;细菌阴转率分别为87%和43%(P<0.01)。结论:吡哌酸滴丸是治疗化脓性中耳炎较满意的药物。 AIM: To compare pipemidic acid pills (PAP) and chloramphenicol ear drops (CED) in treatment of suppurative otitis media. METHODS: Thirty patients (M 19, F 11; age 32±s 17 a) with pyogenic tympanitis were put into nearby the perforating side of the tympanic membrane with PAP 1 or 2 pills, qd for 2 wk. Other similar 29 patients were treated with CED. RESULTS: The total effective rates of PAP and CED groups were 93% and 70%, the average days of treatment were 5.6±2.8 d and 12.0±2.8 d, the becteriological eradication rates were 62% and 28%, the negative conversion rates were 87% and 43%, respectively. There were significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.01). No adverse reaction of PAP was noted. CONCLUSTION: PAP is an effective drug in treating pyogenic tympanitis.
出处 《新药与临床》 CSCD 北大核心 1997年第5期263-264,共2页
关键词 吡哌酸 化脓性中耳炎 氯霉素 pipemidic acid suppurative otitis media chloramphenicol microbial sensitivity tests
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1钱传训,中国医药工业杂志,1993年,24卷,69页
  • 2朱忠勇,实用医学检验学,1992年,543页

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部