存在与认识:德日刑法定罪理论的逻辑困境

Ontology and Epistemology: The Logical Predicament for Convictive Theory of German and Japanese Criminal Law

定罪论是犯罪存在论和认识论的统一。德日刑法定罪理论的存在论与认识论都有深刻逻辑矛盾,存在论是构成要件与违法性和有责性之间关系的矛盾,认识论是构成要件与符合构成要件事实之间关系的矛盾。这些矛盾的直接原因,是德日刑法的形式化犯罪定义。其哲学实质,是混淆了存在论与认识论的性质和功能。德日刑法定罪论根本特征,是三要件的形式化犯罪存在论与二分式的对抗性犯罪认识论相结合。

Convictive theory is the integration of ontology and epistemology of cnme. Botn ontology anu epistemology of the convictive theory of German and Japanese criminal law have deep logical predicament. Ontology has the contradiction between composing elements and illegality and responsibility, while epistemology has the contradiction between composing elements and the fact in accord with the composing elements. The direct reason for these contradictions is the formalized criminal definition of German and Japa- nese criminal law. Its philosophical essence is confusion of the characteristics and functions of ontology and epistemology. The basic characteristic of German and Japanese criminal law convictive theory is the combination of ontology of three-elements formalized crime and epistemology of two-part resistance crime.