东亚还是泛亚:谁“吃掉”谁被引量：1

原文传递

导出

摘要两个机制之间不应互相排斥，而要设法增加互动。在更广泛的基础上进行多层次的合作对各方有利无弊。

作者苑基荣

出处《世界知识》 2008年第1期32-33,共2页 World Affairs

关键词东亚多层次合作

同被引文献25

1The ASEAN Secretariat, "ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation Work Plan (2007-2017)," Singapore, November 20, 2007, http://www. aseansec. org/21104. pdf.
2J · rn Dosch, The Changing Dynamics of Southeast Asian Politics, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007, p. 1. 11-12.
3James Mittelman, "Rethinking the ‘New Regionalism' in the Context of Globalization," Global Governance, 1996, Vol. 2, Number 2, pp. 189-214.
4Raimo V · yrynen, “Regionalism: Old and New,” International Studies Review, 2003, Vol. 5, Number 1, pp. 25-51.
5Helen Wallace, “Europeanization and Globalization: Complementary or Contradictory Trends?” in Shaun Breslin, Christopher Hughes, Nicola Phillips and Ben Rosamond, eds. , New Regionalism in the Global Political Economy : Theories and Cases, Routledge, 2002, p. 149.
6Norman D. Palmer, The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific, D. C. Heath and Company, 1991, p. 39.
7Richard Stubbs, “ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?” Asia Survey, 2002, Vol. 42, Number 3, pp. 444-445.
8Evelyn Goh, "Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia," International Security, Winter 2007/ 2008, Vol. 32, Number 3, p. 124.
9Dosch, The Changing Dynamics of Southeast Asian Politics, p. 185.
10Aileen San Pablo-Baviera, "Regionalism and Community building in East Asia," in Melissa G. Curley and Nicholas Thomas, eds. , Advancing East Asian Regionalism, Routledge, 2007, p. 232.

世界知识

2008年第1期

内容加载中请稍等...