期刊文献+

腹腔镜辅助下远端胃大部切除术治疗早期胃癌的系统评价 被引量:6

Systematic review of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜辅助下远端胃大部切除术(laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy,LADG)治疗早期胃癌的安全性及有效性。方法:本研究从MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国生物医学数据库(CBM)及Cochrane试验注册中心检索并纳入了在1991年-2007年3月间发表的LADG治疗早期胃癌的随机对照试验,并对纳入研究的方法学质量(随机、双盲和对照)进行评价,最后用Revman4.2.9软件进行分析。结果:共纳入4个随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT),包括123例患者。与开腹远端胃大部切除术(open distal gastrectomy,ODG)相比,LADG术后并发症少[OR(odd ratio)0.32,95%CI(confidenceinterval)(0.14,0.71)]、术中出血少[WMD(weight mean difference)-85.72,95%CI(-166.87,-4.58)]、止痛剂的使用次数少[WMD-1.69,95%CI(-2.18,-1.21)]、术后第1次排气时间早[WMD-0.68,95%CI(-1.26,-0.09)];住院时间、切口或吻合口并发症、复发率、转移、死亡率和生存率无明显差异。淋巴结清扫数少于或与ODG相当。但是,LADG手术时间长于ODG。结论:LADG治疗早期胃癌的近期效果优于ODG,远期效果和ODG相当。 Objective:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) in treating early gastric cancer. Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Chinese Biomedical Database ( CBM ) and Cochrane Central Register from 1991 to March 2007 and included RCTs compared LADG to ODG for early gastric cancer. We also evaluated the methodological quality of included studies that involved randomization, blinding, contral. Metaanalysis was performed using Revman 4.2.9 software. Results:Four RCT involving 123 patients were included. Compared to open distal gastrectomy ( ODG ) , LADG had less complications [ odd ratio ( OR ) 0. 33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) ( 0.14 to 0.77 ) ] , less estimated blood loss [ weight mean difference(WMD) - 85.72, 95% CI ( - 166.87 to - 4.58 ) ], lower frequency of analgesic requirement [WMD -1.69, 95% CI( -2.18 to -1.21)], more early postoperative first flatus [WMD -0.68, 95%CI ( -1.26 to -0.09)]. There was no significant difference between two groups in duration of hospital stay, wound or anastomotic complications, recurrence rate, metastasis rate, death rate and survival rate. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was less or equal to ODG. But the operation time was significantly longer in LADG. Conclusion: In this systematic review, the short-term outcome of LADG for early gastric cancer is superior to ODG, and the long-term outcome is similar with ODG.
出处 《肿瘤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期994-998,共5页 Tumor
关键词 胃肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 胃切除术 治疗结果 Meta分析 Stomach neoplasms Laparoscopy Gastrectomy Treatment outcome Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1TAN YK, FIEDING J W. Early diagnosis of early gastric cancer [ J ]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006, 18 ( 8 ) : 821-829.
  • 2郭恩琪,吴育连.胃癌的微创治疗[J].国外医学(外科学分册),2005,32(6):471-475. 被引量:6
  • 3KITANO S, ISO Y, MORIYAMA M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth Ⅰ gastrectomy [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1994, 4 ( 2 ) : 146-148.
  • 4KIM YW, HAN HS, FLEISCHER GD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2003,13 ( 1 ) :26-30.
  • 5郑成竹.腹腔镜胃手术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2002,5(2):90-91. 被引量:37
  • 6LEE J H, HAN H S. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results[ J]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19(2) : 168-173.
  • 7KITANO S, SHIRAISHI N, FUJII K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report[ J]. Surgery, 2002,131 ( 1 ) :S306-S311.
  • 8HAYASHI H, OCHIAI T, SHIMADA H, et al. Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extrapefigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19(9) :1172-1176.
  • 9FUJII K, SONODA K, IZUMI K, et al. T lymphocyte subsets and Th1/Th2 balance after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2003,17 ( 9 ) : 1440-1444.
  • 10VARELA JE, HIYASHI M, NGUYEN T, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2006, 192(6) :837-842.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Huscher C, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Value of extended lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg, 2005, 200: 314.
  • 2Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery,2002, 131: S306-S311.
  • 3Migoh S, Hasuda K, Nakashima K, et al. The benefit of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared with conventional open distal gastrectomy: a case-matched control study. Hepatogastroenterology, 2003, 50: 2251-2254.
  • 4Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Ikebek K, et al. Evaluation of the cost for laparoscopy-assisted Billroth Ⅰ gastretomy. Surg Endosc, 2001,15: 932-936.
  • 5Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Kakisako K, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth Ⅰ gastretomy for cancer: our 10 years' experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002, 12: 204-207.
  • 6Huscher C, Andrea M, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic vs open substotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: a five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg, 2005, 241(2): 232-237.
  • 7Uyama I, Sakurai Y, Komori Y, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with preservation of the vagus nerve accompanied by lymph node dissection for early gastric carcinoma. J Am Surg Coll, 2005, 200(1): 140-145.
  • 8Kennedy T, Connell AM, Love AH, et al. Selective or truncal vagotomy? Five-year results of a double-bind, randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg, 1973, 12: 944-948.
  • 9Otani Y, Furukawa T, Kitagawa Y, et al. New method of laparoscopy-assisted function-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer: vagus-sparing segmental gastrectomy under sentinel node navigation. J Am Surg Coll, 2004, 198(6): 1026-1031.
  • 10Yasuda K, Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, et al.Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for malignant lymphoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2001, 11: 372-374.

共引文献39

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部