期刊文献+

阿Q不能被酷评“大团圆”——与申燕商榷鲁迅研究应有的学理规范

Ah Q Cannot be Criticized as "A Grand Union" ——A Concurrent Discussion with Mr. Shen Yan on the Academic Theories of Lu Xun Studies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 申燕的《<阿Q正传>的艺术缺陷及原因》一文是典型的时下流行的酷评,对《阿Q正传》进行了缺乏学理的质疑和批评。其主要论点是对前人错误观点的简单拼凑,缺乏原创性的新见,而且其认为的缺陷缺少客观依据、牵强附会,体现出相对狭隘、传统、僵化的文学观念。鲁迅研究需要创新、需要破除陈规,但更需要尊重基本事实的真正的学理批评。 Being the typical harsh criticism, Shen Yan' s On the Artistic Deficiencies and Causes of " The Real Story ofAh Q" is popular at present. This essay oppugns and criticizes The Real Story of Ah Q, but such a criticism is not scientific, namely its main ideas are pieced together with the past erroneous points lacking originality; the deficiencies the essay points out are groundless and far- fetched, and it reflects the verkrampte literary views. In studying Lu Xun, we should innovate and abolish the stereotype ; moreover the basic facts must be followed, thus it could be regarded the real academic theoretical criticism.
作者 李亚军 苏芹
出处 《阴山学刊》 2007年第6期31-35,共5页 Yinshan Academic Journal
关键词 《阿Q正传》 酷评 学理规范 “ The Real Story ofAh Q” Harsh Criticism Academic Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献1

  • 1彭小苓,韩蔼丽.阿Q年[M]北京十月文艺出版社,1993.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部