摘要
衣俊卿提出日常生活批判理论,区分日常生活和非日常生活、日常思维和非日常思维,为文化哲学研究提供了新的视角,对于深化人文社会科学研究、说明当今世界文化危机具有积极意义,对于我们的文化哲学和精神文明建设具有重要启示意义。但是目前还显得粗疏,如:注重宏观社会研究而缺乏微观的个体分析,对于日常思维和非日常思维的区分显得绝对化,对"制度化领域"的思维性质判断不够准确。实际上,日常生活中的日常思维即马克思所说的"实践精神的掌握世界的方式",非日常思维即科学的、艺术精神的、宗教精神的掌握方式,后者是在前者的基础上产生的专门的思维方式。双方通过人生感悟达到"度"的掌握而互相联系、互相转化,是不能截然区分的。
Professor Yi Junqing proposes the critical theory of daily life, which draws a distinction between daily life and non-daily life, between daily and non-daily thinking, thus providing a new perspective for cultural and philosophical studies. It has important inspiring significance for deepening humanistic and social studies, for disclosing cultural crises in the present age and for constructing cultural philosophy and promoting ideological progress. However, this theory is inadequately expounded. In fact, daily thinking is "the practice spirit of grasping the world" said by Marx, while non-daily thinking is the way of grasping the world through the scientific spirit, artistic spirit and religious spirit grasp. The two ways are related to each other and thus cannot be separated.
出处
《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》
2007年第5期24-29,共6页
Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
基金
国家十五社会科学基金项目:"文学理论元问题的比较与整合研究成果之一"
批准号为:01BZW005。