摘要
由于相关规定对释明权行使的时间、方式、范围乃至程度都没有也无法作明确规定,导致我国释明权的行使从形式到内容都存在着很大的差异。立足释明权是法官的义务,从司法实践的角度,对释明权的行使阶段、行使形式和方式以及针对不同的释明对象的不同要求加以探讨,以期司法实践中切实发挥释明权的价值功能。
Since there is no clear definition about the relevant provisions of Aufklarungsrecht exercise of timing, methods, scope and even the degree, there comes about a considerable difference in the exercise of right from the form to the content. This article explained that the right is the obligation of judges, and made exploration from the point of view of the judicial practice about the stage of the exercise of the right, exercise form and manner and different requirements in view of different targets in the hope of playing function of value in judicial practice.
出处
《淮阴工学院学报》
CAS
2007年第6期9-13,共5页
Journal of Huaiyin Institute of Technology
关键词
定位
释明权
审判实践
具体运用
location
explanation of right
trial practice
specific application