摘要
余英时反对用"反满"和"反理学"来概括清代学术思想,主张从学术思想演变的"内在理路"考察清代学术思想。同时,余英时也不赞同钱穆只关注其"续"而忽视其"变"的"续宋"说。宋明理学与清代思想之间就其"变"的一面来说,在于成就"内圣"的途径有异:前者主"尊德性",后者主"道问学";就其"不变(续)"的一面说,则是"用"的精神在宋明与清代的绵延相续。清儒的"明道救世"理想与传统儒家的"内圣外王"、宋明儒家的"内圣外王连续体"是一脉相承的。"经世致用"观念是宋明理学和清代学术思想的共同生命所在,更是中国学术发展的生命所在。
Yu Ying- shi thought anti- Man and anti- neo Confucianism couldn＇t generalize academic thoughts in Qing Dynasty . Yu Ying - shi did not agree with Qian Mu on the standpoint, which the academic thought in Qing Dynasty inherited Song Dynasty completely. Reviewing thought in Qing Dynasty should fellow its internal logic. The idealist philosophy of the Song and Ming Dynasties differ from thoughts in Qing Dynasty in many aspects. For example, the former paid more attention to honor the virtuous nature, however the later to follow the knowledge, Meanwhile, Yu Ying- shi considered that there are relationships between the two periods. Internal Saint ＆ External King and practical thought are the basic principles.
出处
《安徽史学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第1期84-89,共6页
Historical Research In Anhui
关键词
内在理路
尊德性
道问学
清代学术思想
余英时
the internal logic
honoring the virtuous nature
following the knowledge
academic thoughts in Qing Dynasty
Yu Ying - shi
