期刊文献+

证券公司自营绩效评价与分类监管规则的有效性 被引量:4

An Empirical Study of Securities Companies' Proprietary Trading Performance and the Effectiveness of Rules of Classification Regulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文使用DEA模型,对中国39家证券公司2003-2006年自营业务绩效和证券行业分类监管规则有效性进行了实证研究。结果显示,弱市中创新类券商的自营绩效不如规范类券商,原因在于市场投资机会缺乏和券商应变能力不足,同时创新类券商在过度等资上存在失误。常规监管阶段证券公司分类监管规则的有效性比综合治理阶段大大提高,但仍需从弱化净资本指标、强化盈利性指标两方面进行改进。鉴于过度筹资是券商的普遍问题,监管者应根据市场状况调整监管措施,弱市中限制各类券商的负债规模。 The paper used DEA model to research the business performance of China 39 securities companies' proprietary trading and the validity of classification supervision roles. The empirical results show that innovative companies perform poorer than the normative companies in bear market, probably due to lacking of investment opportunities and inadequacy of their resilience. The excessive fmancing of the innovative securities companies is inappropriate as well. In conventional monitoring stage, the validity of rules of classification regulation enhanced over that in comprehensive management stage. But the roles still require improvement in two aspects: weakening net capital indicators and strengthening profitability indicators. Given that the excessive financing is a common problem of securities firms, the regulator should adjust regulatory measures according to market conditions, to restrict the size of the liabilities of various brokerage firms in bear market.
作者 张怡
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期12-18,共7页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 证券公司 自营绩效 分类监管 DEA模型 securities companies, performance of proprietary trading, classification regulation, DEA model
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1W.W.Cooper,L.M.Seiford and Laoru Tone.2000.Data Envelopment analysis:A comprehensive Text with Models,Applications,References and DEA-solver Software.p94.
  • 2A.Charnes and W.W.Cooper,Managerial Economics:Past,Present and Future,Journal of enterprise management,vol.1,no.1,pp.5-23,1978.
  • 3Berger,A.N.,and D.Hancock and D.B.Humphrey (1993),"Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function".Journal of Banking and Finance,17,pp.317-347.
  • 4Berger,A.N.and L.J.Mester(1997) "Inside the Black Box:What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions".Journal of Banking and Finance,Vol.21,pp.895-947.
  • 5Carhart M.On persistence in mutual fund performance[J].Journal of Finance,1997,52:57 - 82.
  • 6Chen Tser-Yieth and Tsai-Lien Yeh(2000) "A Measurement of Bank Efficiency,Ownership and Productivity Changes in Taiwan".The Service Industries Journal,Vol..20,No.1,pp.95-109.
  • 7Choi Y.K.,Murthi B.P.S.Relative performance evaluation of mutual funds:a non-parametric approach[J].Journal of Business Finance &Accounting,2001,28(708):853 - 876.
  • 8Fama E,French K.Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies[J].Journal of Finance,1996,51:55 - 84.
  • 9Grabowski,Richard,Rasoul Rezvanian and N.Rangan,"The Effect of Deregulation on the Efficiency of U.S.Banking Firms",Journal of Economics and Business,February,1994,46,39-54.
  • 10L.M.Seiford,Joe Zhu,Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S.Commercial Banks,Management Science,1999,V ol45,Issue 9,pp.1270-1288.

二级参考文献41

共引文献83

同被引文献15

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部