期刊文献+

语调与关联语用推导

Relevance-theoretic Perspective of Intonation as a Constraint on the Inferential Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在关联理论的框架下,交际中话语意义的生成与理解是语境动态构建的过程。明示交际行为能激活听者大脑中的相关语境假设,用以构建与话语最大关联的心理表征,减少信息处理的认知努力,这是包括语调在内的各种明示语言手段对话语意义语用推理进行制约的认知心理理据。以此为出发点,从重音分布、调群切分和调型选择的三个角度分析了英语语调传递的信息对话语意义推理的认知导向。 Relevance Theory emphasizes that utterance production and interpretation involves the dynamic construct of cognitive contexts. The ostensive stimuli embedded in utterances can activate cognitive contextual assumptions to make the addressee's cognition geared towards the maximization of relevance with least possible processing efforts. Taking this as a departure point, this paper is examining the instruction encoded by the stimulus for inferential computations of the addresser' s both informative intention and communicative intention, and particularly analyzing the constraints that three systemic variables of English intonation produce on the inferential process of utterance comprehension, which are tonicity, tonality and tone.
作者 陈敏
出处 《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2008年第1期78-83,共6页 Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 关联理论 语用推导 重音位置 调群切分 调型选择 Relevance Theory pragmatic inference tonicity tonality tone
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]SPERBER D,WILSON D.Relevance:Communication and Cognition[M].2nd ed.Oxford:Blackwell,1995.
  • 2[2]FODOR J A.The Modularity of Mind:An Essay on Faculty Psychology[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,1983.
  • 3[3]ESCANDELL-VIDAL VICTORIA.Intonation and Procedural Encoding:The Case of Spanish interrogatives[M] //Rouchota V,Jucker A.Current Issues in Relevance Theory.Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1998:169-203.
  • 4[4]WILSON D,SPERBER D.Relevance Theory[M] //L Horn,G Ward.The Handbook of Pragmatics.Oxford:Blackwell,2004:607-632
  • 5[5]ITEN C.Non-Truth-Conditional-Meaning:Relevance and Concessive[D].London:University of London,2000.
  • 6[6]BLAKEMORE DIANE.Semantic Constraints on Relevance[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1987.
  • 7[7]WILSON D,SPERBER D.Linguistic Form and Relevance[J].Lingua,1993 (90):1-25.
  • 8[8]BLASS R.Relevance Relations in Discourse:A Study with Special Reference to Sissala[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
  • 9[9]KLINGE A.The English Modal Auxiliaries:from Semantics to Utterance Interpretation[J].Journal of Linguistics,1993 (2):315-357.
  • 10[10]HALLIDAY M A K.Intonation and Grammar in British English[M].The Hague:Mouton,1967.

二级参考文献24

  • 1[2]Chafe, W. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view [A]. In: C. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1976. 25-55.
  • 2[3]Chomsky, N. Deep structure, surface Structure, and semantic Representation [A]. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovitz (eds.) Semantics[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. 183-216.
  • 3[4]Firbas, J. On defining the theme in functional sentence perspective [J]. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1 (1964). 267-280.
  • 4[5]Firbas, J. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of Functional Sentence Perspective [J]. Brno Studies in English 7 (1971). 12-47.
  • 5[6]Givón, T. Introduction [A]. In T. Givón (ed.) Topic continuity in discourse [C]. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1983. 5-41.
  • 6[7]Hajicová, E. Topic and Focus [A]. In P. Sgall (ed.) Contributions to Functional Syntax. Semantics and Language Comprehension (LISEE, 16) [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1984. 189-202.
  • 7[8]Halliday, M. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part II) [J]. Journal of Linguistics 3 (1967). 199-244.
  • 8[9]Hockett, C. A Course in Modern Linguistics [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
  • 9[10]Jackendoff, R. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1972.
  • 10[11]Kuboň, P. Information Packaging Revisited. PhD dissertation of Simon Fraser University, 1999. Available through http://fas.sfu.ca/pub/cs/theses/1999/PetrKubonPhD.pdf.

共引文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部