期刊文献+

七氟醚与丙泊酚在神经外科麻醉恢复期效果比较 被引量:15

A Comparative Study of Rapid Recovery Effects by Sevoflurane and Propofol during Neurosurgery Anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究七氟醚、丙泊酚对神经外科长时间麻醉维持后苏醒时间等的影响。方法将50例神经外科择期手术患者随机分为七氟醚组和丙泊酚组各25例,麻醉维持首先根据BIS监测来调节七氟醚的吸入浓度或丙泊酚的静脉靶控浓度,使BIS维持在45~55之间,然后根据平均动脉压调节瑞芬太尼的输注速率,手术结束后停止麻醉药。观察两组的拔管时间、苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间、简单神经病学评估恢复时间等。结果七氟醚麻醉后拔管时间、苏醒时间、简单神经病学评估恢复时间均明显小于丙泊酚组(均P〈0.05),而定向力恢复时间,术后呕吐、寒战发生率差异无显著性。结论七氟醚和丙泊酚都适合于需要快速苏醒的神经外科麻醉,其中七氟醚苏醒更迅速。 Objective To compare the effects of sevoflurane/remifentanil and propofol/remifentanil on neurosurgery ansthesia. Methods Fifty patients undergoing intracranial surgery were randomly divided into two groups, propofol (P group) or sevoflurane (S group ) for maintaining anaesthesia. The concentration of sevoflurane or propofol was adjusted to maintain BIS during 45 -55. Remifentanil infusion rate was adjusted to keep the mean arterial blood pressure within 15% of the baseline. Drugs were withdrawn in the end of operation. Extubation, analepsia, orientation recovery, and the simple neurologic assessment recovery time were recorded. Results S group showed significantly shorter time of extubation, analepsia, and, simple neurologic assessment than those in the P group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The recovery time of orientation, and incidenc of postoperation nausea and vomiting showed no significant different between two groups. Conclusion Two anesthetics are both fit for the fast recovery requirement during neurosurgery procedures, sevoflurane is better than propofol.
出处 《医药导报》 CAS 2008年第2期193-195,共3页 Herald of Medicine
基金 浙江省医药卫生优秀青年人才专项科研基金资助项目(基金编号:2006QN022)
关键词 七氟醚 丙泊酚 神经外科 麻醉 苏醒 Sevoflurane Propofol Neurosurgery Anesthesia Recovery
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1刘青华,薛富善.异丙酚在神经外科麻醉中的应用[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1997,18(5):295-297. 被引量:10
  • 2雷黎明,张文胜,刘进,龚建辉.七氟醚的临床研究及进展[J].四川解剖学杂志,2006,14(3):45-47. 被引量:27
  • 3ROSOW C E. An overview of remifentanil [J]. Anesth Analg, 1999,89(4 Suppl) :S1 -3.
  • 4BOZTUG N, BIGAT Z, AKYUZ M, et al. Does using the bispectral index (BIS) during craniotomy affect the quality of recovery? [J]. ,J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2006,18 ( 1 ) : 1-4.
  • 5TANG J, CHEN L. WHITE P F, et al. Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 1999,91(1) :253 -261.
  • 6ZUPPA A F, HELFAER M A, ADAMSON P C. Propofol pharmacokinetics [ J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2003,4 ( 1 ) : 124 - 125.
  • 7支延康,姜虹,徐辉,朱也森.长时间颌面手术四种麻醉维持方法的评价[J].实用医学杂志,2005,21(22):2511-2512. 被引量:5
  • 8DUFFY C M, MATTA B F. Sevoflurane and anesthesia for neurosurgery : a review[ J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2000, 12(2) :128 - 140.
  • 9ASHRAF R. A comparative study between sevoflurane and propofol during Intracranial surgery for assessment of rapid recovery : a fandomized prospective blinded study[ J]. Eg J Anaesth, 2005,21 (3) :341 -345.
  • 10SNEYD J R, ANDREWS C J, TSUBOKAWA T. Compa- rison of propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia for elective intracranial surgery [ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94 (6) :778 - 783.

二级参考文献34

  • 1曾邦雄,彭志勇.低流量麻醉[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1996,16(9):478-480. 被引量:15
  • 2黄宇光 罗爱伦.麻醉学[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2000.77-84.
  • 3Baum JA,Aitkenhead AR. Low flow anaesthesia. Anaesthesia,1995,50(Suppl):37.
  • 4Gan TJ, El Molem H, Ray J, et al. Patient controlled antiemesis: a randomized,double blind comparison of two doses of propofol versus placebo. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90(6):1564- 1570.
  • 5Redfield MM, Jacobsen S J, Burnett JC, et al. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA, 2003,289 : 194- 202
  • 6Filipovic M, Wang J, Michaux I, et al. Effect of halothane,sevoflurane and propofol on left ventricular diastolic function in human during spontaneous and mechanical ventilation. BJA, 2005,94(2):186-192
  • 7Gareia C, Julier K, Bestmann L, et al. Preconditioning with sevoflurane decreases PECAM-1 expression and improves one-year cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.BJA,2005,94(2): 159-165
  • 8Bein B, Renner J, Caliebe D, et al. Sevoflurane but Not Propofol Preserves Myocardial Function During Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Anesth Analg, 2005,100 : 610- 6
  • 9Holmstrom A, Akeson J. Desflurane increases ICP more and sevoflurane less than isoflurane in pigs subjected to intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2004 , 16 : 136- 143
  • 10Holmstrorn A, Akeson J, Sevoflurane induces less cerebral vasodilation than isoflurane at the same A-Line Autoregressive index level. Acta Anaethesiol Stand, 2005 , 49 : 16- 22

共引文献37

同被引文献100

引证文献15

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部