摘要
目的比较荧光定量PCR(FQ-PCR)与PCR在检测自然流产组织人细小病毒B19(HPV B19)感染临床应用中的优劣。方法收集自然流产病例41例以FQ-PCR与PCR分别进行流产组织的HPV B19 DNA检测。结果FQ-PCR HPV B19 DNA的阳性检出率为51.20%,PCR HPV B19 DNA的阳性检出率为36.56%,两种方法的阳性检出率经统计学检验具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论FQ-PCR的灵敏性较PCR高,能更加清楚地了解HPV B19在体内的存在状态。
Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of fluorescent quantitative PIER (FQ-PCR) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in determining human parvovirus B19 (HPV B19) in abortion tissues. Methods Tested tissues from 41 cases of unexplained spontaneous abortion were studied using FQ-PCR and PCR assay for HPV B19. Results The prevalence of HPV B19 DNA was 51.20 % by FQ-PCR and 36.56% by PCR in the sera of abortion women, respectively. There was significant difference between them(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The results suggest that FQ-PCR is more sensitive and efficient than traditional PCR for deteting HPV B19 from abortion tissues.
出处
《山西医科大学学报》
CAS
2008年第1期24-26,共3页
Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词
自然流产
人类细小病毒B19
荧光定量PCR
聚合酶链反应
spontaneous abortion
human parvovirus B19
fluorescent quantitative PCR
polymerase chain reaction