体育纪律处罚的程序公正研究

Due Process in Sports Discipline

通过案例分析对体育纪律处罚的程序公正问题进行研究;指出体育纪律处罚应遵守程序公正以保障当事人权利:被中立的仲裁者听证的权利;法律代理的权利;传唤证人的权利;要求说明理由的权利;被告知权;举证责任在体育组织一方。在听证中,听证者身份应独立,听证者应与案件无利害关系,无职能混和。体育组织在选择仲裁员时注重其法律与体育资格,一些体育组织在涉及运动员的听证中规定要有高水平运动经历的人作为仲裁员,以保证运动员权利。

This research studied on due process in spots discipline by using case study and argued the proceeding of spots discipline should follow due process to protect sports parties＇ rights including the right to be heard by no bias arbitrators, the right of legal presentation, the right to summon wimesses, the right to ask explanation, the right to be noticed and the burden of proof should be on sports organization. In the hearings, the arbitrators should be independent and have no interests to the case and no commingling of functions. Both tegal and sports qualification are important for arbitrators in heating and there should be some arbitrators who have the experience of professional sports to protect athlete＇s right when athlete is one party of the heating.