期刊文献+

胰头癌根治术中腹膜后神经、淋巴、软组织廓清的临床意义 被引量:3

Clinical significance of radical pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with retroperitoneai nerve, lymph node and soft-tissue dissection in patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胰头癌根治术中腹膜后神经、淋巴、软纰织廓清的临床意义。方法2000年1月—2004年1月,本院对20例胰头癌患者施行腹膜后神经、淋巴结廓清根治术,并对其临床和病理资料、随访结果进行回顾性分析。结果15例(75%)患者存在淋巴结转移,平均每例检出淋巴结32.7枚(20~62枚)。按淋巴结转移率高低顺序为No.13(45%),No.14(35%),No.17 (25%),No.8(20%),No.12(15%),No.16(15%),No.6(10%)。9例(45%)患者有腹膜后胰外神经浸润。全组术后1例死于肾功能衰竭,1例患者于术后6月死于脑血管意外;另13例患者在术后46月内死于肿瘤局部复发及全身转移,存活超过36个月者9例,5例至今存活,全组患者3年生存率为45%。结论淋巴结转移和神经侵犯是影响胰腺癌预后的重要因素,可切除胰头癌在术中施行腹膜后神经、淋巴、软组织廓清足安全、有效的。 Objective To investigate the clinical significance of radical pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with retroperitoneal nerve, lymph node and soft-tissue dissection. Methods Clinical data of 20 patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head undergoing this radical surgery from 2000 to 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The regional lymph node metastasis occurred in 15 cases(75% ), the mean number of examined lymph node was 32. 7, the most common metastatic lymph nodes were in order of No. 13(45% ), No. 14(35% ), No. 17(25% ) ,No. 8(20% ), No. 12( 15% ), No. 16( 15% ) and No. 6 ( 10% ). Perineural invasion occurred in 9 cases(45% ). One case died of renal failure after operation,one case died of cerebrovascular disease after six months, 13 cases died of tumor recurrence or metastasis in 46 months after surgery. The 3-year survival rate was 45%, Conclusion Lymph node metastasis and perineural invasion are important prognostic factor for cephalic pancreatic carcinoma. The radical pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with nerve, lymph node and soft tissue dissection in the retroperitoneum is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of adenocarcinom in the pancreatic head.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期833-835,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 腹膜后间隙 淋巴结转移 神经侵犯 Pancreatic neoplasms Retroperitoneal space Lymph node metastasis Perineural
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1钟守先.胰头癌根治术之我见[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(5):262-263. 被引量:14
  • 2张延龄.可切除性胰腺癌手术治疗的结果分析要点(文献综述)[J].国外医学(外科学分册),2004,31(2):66-68. 被引量:2
  • 3Zhu Z, Friess H, diMola FF, et al. Nerve growth factor expression correlates with perineural invasion and pain in human pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1999,17:2419-2428.
  • 4邵成浩,胡先贵,张怡杰,刘瑞,金钢,唐岩.淋巴结转移、神经侵犯对胰头部小胰癌预后的影响[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(8):851-852. 被引量:2
  • 5Nakao A, H arada A, Nonami T, et al. Clinical significance of carcinoma invasion of the extrapancreatic nerve plexus in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas, 1996,12:357-361.
  • 6Nagakawa T, Moil K, Nakano T, et al. Perineural invasion of carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tract. Br J Surg, 1993,80: 619:621.
  • 7Janpan Pancreas Society. The general rules of clinical and pathological management for carcinoma of the pancreas. Kanehara Pub Comp, 1986:35-37.

二级参考文献34

  • 1胡先贵.努力提高胰腺癌术后长期生存率[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(8):842-844. 被引量:7
  • 2Sue B, et al. Ann Surg2003; 237(1):57 - 65.
  • 3Conlon KC, et al. Ann Surg 2001 ; 234(4) :487 - 494.
  • 4Li-Ling J, et al. Br J Surg 2001; 88(2) :190- 199.
  • 5Gouillat C, et al. Br J Surg 2001; 88( 11 ) : 1456 - 1462.
  • 6Neoptolemos JP, et al. Lancet 2001; 358:1576 - 1585.
  • 7Lygidakis NJ, et al. Ann Surg 2002; 236(6) : 806 - 813.
  • 8Lorenz M, et al. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36(8) : 957 - 965.
  • 9Ishikawa O, et al. Gan to Kagaka Ryoho 1990; 17(8) : 1687 - 1691.
  • 10Rosenberg L, et al. Drugs 2000; 59:1071 - 1076.

共引文献15

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部