期刊文献+

椎间植骨融合加椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎滑脱 被引量:1

Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined Pedicle Screws Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎间植骨融合联合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎滑脱症的效果。方法114例腰椎滑脱患者采用后路椎弓根螺钉复位固定加椎间植骨融合术。结果平均手术时间(267±23)min,出血量(915±175)ml,术中无神经、输尿管及大血管损伤等严重并发症。平均随访17.9(9~48)个月。椎间植骨融合率95.6%,融合时间平均9.3(3.5~6.5)个月,未融合5例。椎间隙高度维持良好,滑脱椎体复位无丢失。疗效评价:优73例,良29例,可9例,差3例,优良率为89.5%。结论椎间植骨融合加椎弓根螺钉内固定是治疗腰椎滑脱症的一种有效措施。 Objective To explore the outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion combined pedicle screws fixation in the treatment of spondylolisthesis. Method After repositioned by the pedicle screws, 114 patients underwent lumbar interbody fusion. Results The mean operation time was (267±23 ) minutes, and the mean bleeding volume was(915 ±175)ml. No severe complication such as injuries of nerve, ureter, or great vessel was observed. All were followed up for average 17.9 (9 ~48 ) months. The bone union rate of was 95.6% within average 9.3 ( 3.5 ~ 6.5 ) months. The intervertebral space kept well and there was no angle lost after reposition. There were 73 of good, 29 of fine, 9 of fair and 3 of worse. The good and fine rate was 89.5%. Conclusion The lumbar interbody fusion combined pedicle screws fixation is an effective method in the treatment of the lumbar spondylolisthesis.
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2007年第6期452-454,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
关键词 脊柱前移 椎间植骨融合术 spondylolisthesis lumbar interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Marehetti PG, Binazzi R, Briccoli A, et al. The surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis[ J]. Chit Organi Mov, 1994, 79( 1 ) :85-91.
  • 2Suk SI, Kim JH, Cho K J, et al. Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation? [J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(9) :1359-1365.
  • 3Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1976, (117) :23-29.
  • 4Goto K, Tajima N, Chosa E, et al. Effects of lumbar spinal fusion on the other lumbar intervertebral levels ( three-dimensional finite element analysis)[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2003,8(4) :577-584.
  • 5aMadan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis [J]. Spine,2002, 27(14) :1536-1542.
  • 6Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system : two-year resuits from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial[ J ]. Spine, 2000,25 ( 11 ) : 1437-1446.
  • 7Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis [J]. Spine,2007, 32(20) :2178-2183.
  • 8Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, et al. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine [ J ]. Spine, 2006, 31 (12):1351-1357.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部