期刊文献+

军事领域本体构建研究 被引量:20

Research on Military Domain Ontology Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在仿真系统的研究过程中,面临军事领域知识获取及不同应用之间的互操作等问题。这些难题的背后实际是技术人员和军事人员之间理解一致性和机器之间理解一致性的问题。本体是关于事物本质的模型,已被广泛应用于知识分类、表达、共享及重用等方面。首先,讨论了本体的概念并给出了领域本体构建的一套通用原则和方法。然后详细分析了军事领域本体所包含的各方面知识元素,包括作战单元类、单元之间的关系、交战行为、交战规则、武器装备、作战计划等,并分别给出了它们的简单表示结构。最后概要讨论了多个本体合并时的本体检验问题。标准化的军事知识表示结构可以为技术人员和军事人员之间的交流提供统一的认识和参照,为机器之间的互操作提供一种"语言",从而消除理解上的冲突和混乱,为作战仿真系统的开发扫清了道路。 Military knowledge acquisition and inter-operation among different applications are difficult problems in developing military simulation systems.The coherent comprehension between technical experts and military experts and between machine and machine stands behind the two big problems.Ontology is the model about the essence of things,and it has been widely applied in many aspects,such as knowledge classification,representation,sharing and reusing,etc.Firstly,the concept of ontology is analyzed and a set of general principles and steps of ontology development are presented firstly.This is followed by detailed analysis of all knowledge elements involved in military domain,including combat units and relationships between them,combat actions,engagement rules,equipments,operation plans,etc.Then the representation structures of the knowledge elements are described one by one.Finally ontology checking is briefly discussed.The standard military knowledge representation structures can be used as a common reference for the communication between technical experts and military experts and as a "language" to facilitate the communication between machines.It can eliminate the disagreement on comprehension of the same things and help to develop the military simulation system.
出处 《计算机仿真》 CSCD 2007年第12期6-9,40,共5页 Computer Simulation
关键词 本体 知识元素 本体构建 军事领域 Ontology Knowledge element Ontology development Military domain
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1王珏,袁小红,石纯一,郝继刚.关于知识表示的讨论[J].计算机学报,1995,18(3):212-224. 被引量:54
  • 2高济.基于表示本体论的智能系统开发[J].计算机研究与发展,1996,33(11):801-807. 被引量:21
  • 3王洪伟 吴家春 蒋馥.本体的形式化模型及在语义查询中的应用[A]..Advances of search engine and web mining in China(搜索引擎与Web挖掘进展)[C].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.205~213.
  • 4Gruber T R. Ontolingua:a translation approach to portable ontology specifications[J]. Knowledge Acquisition,1993,5(2):199-220.
  • 5Guarino N. Formal ontologies and information systems[A]. Guarino N. Formal ontology in information systems,proceedings of FOIS' 98[C]; Amsterdam :IOS Press, 1998 : 3- 17.
  • 6Pepijn R S, et al. Assessing heterogeneity by classifying ontology mismatches[Z]. AAAI' 97 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering at Stanford University, USA.
  • 7Horrocks I,Patel-Schneider P F,Van Harmelen F. Reviewing the design of DAML+OIL:an ontology language for the semantic web[A]. Proc. of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence[C],2002.
  • 8Poll R. Ontology and knowledge organization[A]. Proc. of 4th Conf. of the International Society of Knowledge Organization[C]. Washington, 1996.
  • 9Lenat, Guha. Building large knowledge-based system- representation and inference in the CYC project [M].Addison-Wesley Press, 1990.
  • 10MacGregor. Inside the LOOM classifier[J]. SIGART Bulletim, 1991,2(3): 70-76.

共引文献82

同被引文献264

引证文献20

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部