摘要
何谓艺术作品的规定,是西方美学探讨的重要问题。康德从主体论美学出发,把艺术作品规定为天才的作品,从而形成了他的天才论的艺术观。与康德不同,海德格尔基于存在论,揭示了艺术作品对艺术的敞开,以及存在及其对艺术作品的规定,从而克服了康德主体论美学与理性形而上学的根本困境。就力图为艺术作品寻求某种规定而言,海德格尔的美学思想仍然具有某些形而上学的残余,但他的形而上学与一般的形而上学却有着极大的不同。
What is the definition of work of art , this is an important question explored in western aesthetics. Started from subjective aesthetics, Kant stipulated work of art as the work of genius, thus it formed his genius art view. Different from Kant, Heidegger based on ontology of Being, he revealed that work of art uncover art, and Being and its definition for work of art, overcame fundamental difficulty in Kant subjective aesthetics and rational metaphysics thereby. As it try to explore a definition of work of art,Heidegger′s aesthetics thought still has some remains of metaphysics, but his metaphysics is different from general metaphysics.
出处
《黄山学院学报》
2007年第6期32-37,共6页
Journal of Huangshan University
关键词
艺术作品
规定
天才
存在
比较
work of art
definition
genius
Being
comparison