期刊文献+

逻辑与历史的不平衡和统一性的对比研究--孙绍振研究兼与苏珊·朗格《情感与形式》比较

A Study on Sun Shaozhen's Theory: the Imbalance and the Unity of Logic and History——Comparing with Susan Langer's Feeling and Forms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文的研究聚集于孙绍振的新著《文学性讲演录》,着重分析其对情感逻辑、文学形式规范等问题的研究,并将之与苏珊.朗格的形式主义美学进行了细致深入的比较。虽然苏珊.朗格对艺术形式的研究达到了相当的高度与力度,但也因其形而上特质而流于空疏,而孙绍振恰恰在她无法深入之处,以其罕见的经验归纳与理论抽象能力,将原本形而上的概念与规律予以深化、细化、具体化与可操作化。而这种分区,所体现的乃是二者各自基于不同的学术传统所做的继承与超越,以及出于不同的理论目的与兴趣所进行的理论建构。 This paper focuses on Sun Shaozhen's new works A Lecture on Literariness, deeply analyzes Sun's study on the logic of feeling and the literary formal principles, and compares it with Susan Langer's formalist aesthetics in detail. As a conclusion, we consider that Langer's study on art forms achieves a considerable height and strength, but it is a little empty because of its metaphysical character, while Sun deepens, particularizes, reifys and operationalizes the metaphysical concepts and principles which Langer cannot discuss deeply with his unusual abilities of induction and abstraction. The difference between Sun and Langer shows they both inherit and exceed each academic tradition, and construct their own theory proceeding from each theoretical aim and interest.
作者 吴励生 叶勤
出处 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期103-110,共8页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词 《文学性讲演录》 《情感与形式》 情感逻辑 艺术形式 A Lecture on Literariness, Feeling and Forms, the logic of feeling, art forms
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1[美]乔纳森·卡勒.结构主义诗学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部