期刊文献+

ESWL治疗肾下盏结石386例疗效分析 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗肾下盏结石386例,结石总排空率为90.16%,残石率为9.84%;结石直径〈11、11~15、16~20、〉20mm者,排空率分别为95.08%、91.55%、38.2%、31.3%;ESWL后,残石率在肾盏肾盂高度〈15mm者为4.59%、≥15mm者为16.67%,在肾下盏肾盂夹角1〉90°者为3.17%、〈90°者为22.38%,肾下盏长度≤30mm者为3.29%、〉30mm者为23.81%,肾下盏盏颈宽度〉4mm者为4.05%、≤4mm者为28.89%;肾下盏形状简单者为2.98%、复杂者为20.53%。认为肾下盏结石的大小以及肾下盏相关的解剖因素与肾下盏结石ESWL后的排空密切相关。
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第3期65-66,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Tuckey J, Devasia A, Murthy L,et al. Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle [ J] . J Endourol,2000,14(6) : 475 - 478.
  • 2Srivastava A, Zaman W, Singh V, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower calyceal stone: a statistical model[J]. BJU International,2004,93 (3) : 364-368.
  • 3Onal B, Demirkesen O, Tansu N, et al. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones [ J ]. J Urol,2004,172 ( 3 ) : 1082 - 1086.
  • 4钟文,曾国华.肾下盏结石的微创外科治疗[J].国外医学(泌尿系统分册),2005,25(5):621-624. 被引量:41
  • 5Pace KT,Tariq N, Dyer SJ, et al. Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy : a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Urol,2001,166 (6) :2065 -2071.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Srivastava A, Zaman W, Singh V, et al. Efficacy of extracorooreal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower calyceal stone: a statistical model. BJU International,2004,93 (3) :364 - 368.
  • 2Chassy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, et al. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. 1981.Jornal Article] Journal of Urology,2002,167(5): 1957 - 1960.
  • 3Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi. Journal of Urology,2001,166(6):2081 -2085.
  • 4Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower pole Ⅰ: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - initial results. Journal of Urology, 2001,166(6) :2072 - 80.
  • 5Graff J, Diedrichs W, Schulze H. Long- term follow up in 1003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Uro, 1998,140(2) :479 - 483.
  • 6CarrLK,D'AHoneyJ,JewettMA,etal. New stone formation:a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol, 1996,155(5): 1565 - 1567.
  • 7Onal B, Demirkesen O, Tansu N, et al. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones. Journal of Urology,2004,172(3): 1082 - 6.
  • 8May DJ, Chandhoke PS. Efficacy and cost - effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi. Journal of Urology, 1998,159(1) :24 - 7.
  • 9Sampaio FJ,D' Anunciacao AL,Silva EC. Comparative follow- up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum- pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyceal stones: preliminary report and proposed study design. J Endourol, 1997,11:157.
  • 10Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, et al. Lower - Pole Caliceal Stone Clearance After Shockwave Lithotripsy, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy,and Flexible Ureteroscopy: Impact of Radiographic Spatial Anatomy. Journal of Urology, 1999,161 (5): 1731 - 1732.

共引文献40

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部