期刊文献+

硬膜外和静脉自控镇痛效果的比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较硬膜外和静脉自控镇痛在术后镇痛中的临床效果。方法:100例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期在硬膜外麻醉下行经腹全子宫切除术或子宫肌瘤剔除术患者,术后随机分为两组:硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)组(E组)和静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)组(I组)。镇痛药配方E组为:布比卡因150mg+芬太尼0.2mg+氟哌利多5mg+生理盐水稀释至100ml;I组为:芬太尼1.0mg+氟哌利多5mg+生理盐水稀释至100ml。镇痛泵设置为:负荷量3ml,持续剂量2ml/h,自控剂量1ml,锁定时间15min,4h限量30ml。记录术后4、8、12、24和48h的安静和活动VAS评分、Ramsay评分,恶心呕吐、尿潴留、下肢麻木等不良反应和进食时间、出院时间。结果:术后4、8hI组的VAS评分、Ramsay评分高于E组(P<0.05)。术后48h内I组恶心呕吐的发生率高,E组尿潴留、下肢麻木的发生率明显高于I组(P<0.05)。进食时间和出院时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:两种镇痛方法均可以满足临床需要,4、8hPCEA镇痛效果稍优于PCIA,PCIA恶心呕吐发生率高,PCEA尿潴留、下肢麻木等并发症发生率高。
出处 《广西医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第6期910-911,共2页 Journal of Guangxi Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Charles G, Lise RN, Edward G, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine, 2003,28(8), 739-743.
  • 2Christopher LW, Seth RC, Jeffrey MR,et al. Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: A meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 2005,103(5) :1 079-1 088.
  • 3Schenk MR, Putzier M, Kugler B, et al. Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery: patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. Anesth analg, 2006,103(5) : 1 311-1 317.
  • 4Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Durgs, 2000,59 (2) : 213.
  • 5Dolin SJ, Cashman JN. Tolerability of acute postopera tive pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritis,and urinary retention. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth, 2005,95(5) :584-591.
  • 6刘超,潘宁玲,马亚群.手术后镇痛引发锥体外系并发症(附4例报告)[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2003,23(1):7-7. 被引量:16
  • 7沈伯雄,杭燕南.氟哌利多的药理作用、不良反应及临床评价[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2005,26(6):352-354. 被引量:43

二级参考文献20

  • 1郑斯聚 见:刘俊杰 赵俊 主编.镇静安定药[A].见:刘俊杰,赵俊,主编.现代麻醉学:第2版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.326-329.
  • 2Tang J,Chen X,White PF,et,al.Antiemetic prophylaxis for office based surgery:are the 5 -HT3receptor antagonists beneficial.? Anesthesiology,2003,98(2) :293 -298.
  • 3White PF.Droperidol :A Cost - Effective Antiemetic for Over Thirty Years.Anesth Analg,2002,95 (4) :789-790.
  • 4Hill RP,Lubarsky DA,Phillips BB,et al.Cost -effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron,droperidol,or placebo Anesthesiology,2000,92 (4) :958 -967.
  • 5Kreisler NS,Spiekermann BF,Ascari CM,et al.Small -dose droperidol effectively reduces nausea in a general surgical adult patient populatiou.Anesth Analg,2000,91 (5):1256-1261.
  • 6Millo J,Siddons M,lnnes R,et al.Randomised double - blind comparison of ondansetron and droperidol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with patient- controlled analgesia.Anaesthesia,2001,56(1):60-65.
  • 7Helmy SA.Prophylactic anti - emetic efficacy of ondansetron in laparoscopic cholecystectomy under total intravenous anaesthesia.A randomised,double -blind comparison with droperidol,metoelopramide and placebo.Anaesthesia,1999,54 (3) :266-271.
  • 8Janknegt R,Pinekaers JW,Rohof MH,et al.Double - blind comparative study of droperidol,granisetron and granisetron plus dexamethasone as prophylactic anti - emetic therapy in otolaryngological surgery.Anaesthesia,1999,54 (11) :1059-1068.
  • 9Fujii Y,Tanaka H,Somekawa Y.Granisetron,droperidol and metoclopramide for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,182(Pt 1) :13-16.
  • 10Domino KB,Anderson EA,Polissar Nl,et al.Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron,droperidol,and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting:a meta- analysia.Anesth Analg,1999,88 (6):1370 - 1379.

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部