期刊文献+

瑞典药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架的长期疗效对比 被引量:1

Long-Term Outcomes with Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Sweden
下载PDF
导出
摘要 前瞻性随机临床试验已经发现.药物洗脱支架的使用与金属裸支架相比没有增加支架内血栓的形成。在包括大约4500名患者的前瞻性试验的基础上.美国食品药品监督管理局批准了药物洗脱支架在先前不能处理的一些冠脉病变的患者中的使用。在这些试验中.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架相比表现为安全、心血管事件无显著增加。但是,药物洗脱支架的应用已经迅速扩展到所有的患者中,
作者 钟明江 张斌
机构地区 广东省人民医院
出处 《循证医学》 CSCD 2007年第6期325-328,334,共5页 The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
关键词 药物洗脱支架 金属裸支架 支架血栓 再狭窄 drug-eluting stents bare-metal stents stent thrombosis restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Aoki J, Colombo A, Dudek D, et al. Persistent remodeling and neointimal suppression 2 years after polymer-based, Paclitaxeleluting stent implantation: Insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analysis in the TAXUS Ⅱ study [J]. Circulation, 2005,112: 3876-3883.
  • 2Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2005, 45 : 995 -998.
  • 3Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: An observational study of drugeluting versus baremetal stents [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2006, 48 : 2584-2591.
  • 4Rao SV, Shaw RE, Brindls RG, et al. On-versus off-label use of drug-eluting coronary stents in clinical practice (report from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular myocardial infarction-executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (writing conmmittee to revise the 1999 guideIines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction) [J ]. Circulation, 2004,110 : 588-636.
  • 5Fragmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomised muhicentre study [J]. Lancet, 1999,354:708-715.
  • 6Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibitor tirofiban [J]. N Engl J Med, 2001,344 : 1879-1887.
  • 7Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction:The British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial:Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina [J]. Lancet, 2002,360:743-751.
  • 8Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina:the second Raudomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial [J]. Lancet, 1997,350:461-468.
  • 9Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy eompared with angioplasty in stable eoronary artery disease [J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,341:70-76.
  • 10Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ, et al. The Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS-Ⅱ ): A randomized,controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease:One-year resuhs[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004,43 : 1743-1751.

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部