期刊文献+

慢性肾脏病患者生活质量的初步分析 被引量:11

Prelimimary study of quality of life among the patients with chronic kidney disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用改良的肾脏病生活质量量表1.3(KDQOL—SF^TM 1.3)对慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的生活质量进行初步分析。方法采用问卷调查的方法收集44例门诊CKD患者的生活质量数据进行分析。结果18个维度中有11项α信度系数〉0.6,其中7项α信度系数超过了0.8。对反映简化36医疗结局研究量表(SF-36)的8个维度采用因子分析法,经最大方差旋转后产生2个主成分,共解释了64.66%的总方差。肾脏病相关生存质量(KDTA)总分与SF-36量表总分的相关系数为0.421。不同性别在“总体健康”一项中差异有统计学意义(P=0.026),肾功能正常与不全两组患者在“症状与不适”方面的差异具有统计学意义。“症状与不适”、“睡眠”、“社会的支持”、“疼痛”4项均与年龄呈负相关。结论本改良量表基本适合我国国情,但需进一步改良与完善。 Objective To study the quality of life among the patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) through the modified KDQOL-SF^TM 1.3 short-form health survey. Method 44 patients with CKD were involved in this study. The data of KDQOL-SF^TM 1.3 short-forms were collected and analyzed. Results The modified KDOQI-SF^TM 1.3 showed internal consistency (every Cronbach α coefficients of 11 dimensions was greater than 0. 60). Factor analysis resulted in two factors that were consistent with the theoretical hypothesis in some degree. They could be used to explain 64. 66% of the total variance. The correlation coefficient of the total score between the KDTA and the SF-36 was 0. 421. There was significant difference in "General health" between male and female (P〈0. 05). There was also significant difference in "symptom/discomfort" between normal renal function griyo and renal failure group (P〈0. 05). The scores of "symptom/discomfort", "sleep", "social support" and "pain" correlated with the age negatively (P〈0. 05). Conclusions The modified KDQOL-SF^TM 1.3 is suitable to the condition of our country.
出处 《临床肾脏病杂志》 2007年第6期256-259,共4页 Journal Of Clinical Nephrology
基金 江苏省科技厅社会发展项目(BS2003058)
关键词 肾脏病 慢性 生存质量 信度 效度 Chronic kidney disease Quality of life Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献20

  • 1马祖等,郑智华,张涤华,叶任高,郝元涛,娄探奇,毛晓玲,刘岩,张弘,汪华林,付君舟,余学清.血液透析患者生存质量的多中心研究[J].中国血液净化,2004,3(7):380-384. 被引量:95
  • 2马祖等,郑智华,叶任高,张涤华,吴培根,沈清瑞,余学清.血液透析患者营养状况的评估方法研究[J].新医学,2004,35(10):600-601. 被引量:26
  • 3朱晓峰,张金元,韩国锋,于秀峙,孙晶.维持性血液透析患者抑郁患病情况及相关因素研究[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2005,21(2):93-94. 被引量:56
  • 4马祖等,郑智华,张涤华,郝元涛,叶任高,娄探奇,毛晓玲,刘岩,刘冠贤,朱起之,张增华,汪华林,傅君舟,余学清.血液透析和腹膜透析患者生存质量的多中心调查[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2004,20(6):400-405. 被引量:87
  • 5Callahan MB. Using quality of life measurement to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration. Adv Ren Replace Ther, 2001, 8(2):148-151
  • 6Callahan MB, LeSage L, Johnstone S. A model for patient participation in quality of life measurement to improve rehabilitation outcomes. Nephrol News Issues, 1999, 13(1):33-37
  • 7Mendelssohn DC, Mullaney SR, Jung B, et al. What do American nephologists think about dialysis modality selection?. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001, 37(1):22-29
  • 8Kimmel PL, Emont SL, Newmann JM, et al. ESRD patient quality of life: symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. Am J Kidney Dis, 2003, 42(4):713-721
  • 9Arogundade FA, Zayed B, Daba M, et al. Correlation between Karnofsky Performance Status Scale and Short-Form Health Survey in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. J Natl Med Assoc, 2004, 96(12):1661-1667
  • 10Fernado V, Rosa J, Juan M. Quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2001,38:443-464

共引文献185

同被引文献124

引证文献11

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部