期刊文献+

信息不对称、信号传递方式与供应商甄选博弈 被引量:2

Asymmetric Information,Signaling Manner and Vendor Selection Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文从供应商传递信息方式的角度来研究信息不对称情形下供应商的甄选问题。研究首先将对称信息与非对称信息情况下供应商甄选结果及供需双方的收益进行比较,得出信息不对称导致供应链上供应商的逆向选择问题。然后运用信号传递成本无差异与信号传递成本有差异这两种类型信号博弈模型来解决不对称信息下的供应商选择问题,并得出结论只有信号传递成本在不同类型的供应商之间存在差异,信号才能起到类型显示的作用,从而解决信息不对称情形下供应商的甄选问题。 This paper discusses the vendor selection under asymmetric information from the aspect of signaling manner. It compares the selection outcome and benefits between symmetric information and asymmetric information, and concludes that asymmetric information leads to adverse selection in the vendor selection in the supply chain. This paper also utilizes the equal cost signaling game model and unequal cost signaling game model to investigate the vendor selection under asymmetric information, and concludes that only unequal cost signaling manner reveals the real type of the supplier and solves the adverse selection in the vendor selection in the supply chain.
作者 王洁 陈功玉
出处 《南方经济》 北大核心 2007年第12期73-80,共8页 South China Journal of Economics
关键词 信息不对称 信号传递 信号博弈 供应商甄选 Asymmetric Information Signaling Transfer Signaling Game Vendor Selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1刘晓,李海越,王成恩,储诚斌.供应商选择模型与方法综述[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(1):139-148. 被引量:182
  • 2梁建英,李垣,廖貅武.信号成本与服务外包供应商信号传递关系的博弈模型[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(1):99-105. 被引量:26
  • 3Akerlof, G., 1970, The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.
  • 4Cachon,G.P., M.A. Lariviere, 2001,Contracting to assure supply: how to share demand forecast in a supply chain, Management Science, 47,629-646.
  • 5Lee, H.L. ,P. Padmanabhan and S. Whang, 1997, Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect, Management Science, 43, 546-558.

二级参考文献106

  • 1王哲,容毅虹,于渤,徐殿国.利用基于TOCO的新工具实现供应商选择的科学决策[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(4):43-49. 被引量:4
  • 2[1]A.Ghobadian,A.Stainer,T.Kiss.A computerized vendor rating system[C],Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Logistics,The University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK,July 1993,321-328.
  • 3[2]Dickson,G.,An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions[J].Journal of Purchasing 1996,2:28-41.
  • 4[3]C.A.Weber,J.R.Current,W.C.Benton.Vendor selection criteria and methods[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1991,50:2-18.
  • 5[4]Holt,G.D.,R.Which contractor selection methodology?[J].International Journal of Project Management 1998,16:153-164.
  • 6[5]Zeger Degraeve,Eva Labro,Filip Roodhooft.An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective[J].European Journal of Operational Research,125:2000,34-58.
  • 7[6]Luitzen de Boer,Eva Labro.Pierangela Morlacchi,A review of methods supporting supplier selection[J].European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,2001,7:75-89.
  • 8[7]W.C Benton,Seunwook Park.A classification of literature on determining the lot size under quantity discounts[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1996,92:219-238.
  • 9[8]Gregory,R.E..Source selection:a matrix approach[J].European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,1986,22:24-29.
  • 10[9]Timmerman,E..An approach to vendor performance evaluation[J].Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,1986,1:27-32.

共引文献205

同被引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部