期刊文献+

论强化行政诉讼原告的举证地位

On Strengthening the Plaintiff's Status of Presenting Evidence in Administrative Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行法律所确立的行政诉讼举证责任模式基本符合当代行政诉讼的本质和价值,但仍需进一步完善,以更好地提高行政诉讼原告的举证地位。在立法层面上,应修改行政诉讼法典,进一步完善相关法律条文,加强行政诉讼原告举证地位的法律保障;在理解层面上,应遵循现代行政诉讼制度的本质,侧重于对行政诉讼举证地位的保障;在实践层面上,应改变职权探知主义为主、辩论主义为辅的模式,切实提高行政诉讼原告举证时的主体地位。 Distrubution of the burden of proof in the administrative litigation refers to sharing the rights and duties of presenting the evidence among the plaintiff, the defendant and the court which are formed in the course of the negotiation process. At present, the model of the burden of proof basically conforms to the modern administrative litigation's essence. To enhance the plaintiffs status of presen- ting evidence well, it is necessary to further perfect the system of presenting evidence. To really strengthen and practically improve the plaintiffs status of presenting the evidence, we should change the administrative litigation law and further perfect the related legal article; we should understand the law according to the legislative original intention and in line with the modern administrative litigation system's essence; we should thoroughly transform the model of the burden of proof.
出处 《河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第4期56-60,共5页 Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基金 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目"行政诉讼原告论"(04SJD8200001)
关键词 行政诉讼 原告 举证责任 地位 administrative litigation plaintiff the burden of proof status
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献16

  • 1《管子·心术上》.
  • 2.《商君书·算地》[M].,..
  • 3.《韩非子·心度》[M].,..
  • 4.《春秋繁露·王道通三》[M].,..
  • 5.《荀子·劝学》[M].,..
  • 6.《马克思恩格斯全集》 第1卷[M].人民出版社,1956年版.第428页、第428页、第439页.
  • 7吕思勉:《中国制度史》《上海人民出版社1985年版《第819页.
  • 8梁治平:《梁治平自选集》《广西师范大学出版社1997年版《第26页.
  • 9《管子》之《枢言》、《任法》.
  • 10《淮南鸿烈解》卷十一《齐俗训》.

共引文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部