也谈人称代词做定语时“的”字的隐现

Further discussions on de's usage in phrases with personal pronouns as modifiers

"不可让渡说"、"双向领属说"等观点不能全面解释人称代词做定语时"的"字的隐现规律。本文试图从关系组配和动态使用这两个方面加以解释。从关系组配上看,关系组配的结构可以隐去"的",非关系组配的结构需要出现"的"。关系组配的甲、乙两项在数量匹配上的要求也制约着"的"字的隐现。从动态使用上看,独立指称时不能隐去"的"的"代+名"结构,在动态使用中若作为一个整体与其他成分相对应,其中的"的"也可以隐去。如果要凸显偏项("代")的修饰性,无论独立指称时带"的"与否,都要出现"的"。

Theories such as 'Inalienableness' and 'Bidirectional Possession' fail to give a full explanation to de's usage as a modifier marker in the phrases with personal pronouns as modifiers.This paper provides explanations from the perspectives of relational combination and dynamic state.From the perspective of relational combination,one can get the basic rule:if the phrase is a relational combination,de can be omitted;if not,de can not be omitted.The match restriction of the relational combinations in number also controls the usage of de.From the perspective of dynamic state,de's usage can be explained according to two states of phrases:(1) the static state means the phrase stands alone without any context and de cannot be omitted;(2) the dynamic state means the phrase connects with other constituents and when the modifier-noun phrase is considered as a whole de can be omitted.Furthermore,when the modifier is profiled,de must appear whether it originally exists in the phrase or not.