期刊文献+

对医学基础研究中“确凿证据”的认识 被引量:1

Experience of "Solid Evidence" in Basic Medical Science Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 医学基础研究中得到的确切可靠、无可辩驳的结论,可称为"确凿证据"。其重要性在于能对"一般证据"做出判断;可据此设计实验,提出并验证假说。所以准确判断十分重要,判断错误将误导实验,延缓实验进程。可分为两类:直接可见的结果或是经过严密实验设计得出的结论。我们要慎重判断"确凿证据",也要善于利用其得出结论。 In the basic medical research, many conclusions may be drawn from the experimental results. As evidence, only the conclusion definitely reliable could be regarded as "solid evidence". It can be used for the judgment of the "common evidence", and can be basis for the design of following experiment. So discrimination is critical important, wrong judgment leads to delayed experimental process. The solid evidence may be visible directly, or may be conclusion based on strictly experimental design. We should judge the solid evidence cautiously, and should also be good at drawing conclusions based on it.
出处 《医学与哲学(B)》 2008年第1期54-56,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy(B)
关键词 确凿证据 医学基础研究 实验设计 solid evidence, medical basic research, experiment design
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1谢湘 周欣宇.杨焕明的心痛:面对SARS中国科学家打了败仗[N].中国青年报,2003-05-26.
  • 2徐斌.洪涛院士直面衣原体之误[N].科学时报,2003-06-05.
  • 3张永谦.尊重权威尤爱真理[N].科学时报,2003-06-11.
  • 4廖怀凌 郑文.钟南山:科学家受体制制约科研不容夸口[N].羊城晚报,2003-06-11.
  • 5朱晓超 曹海丽.发现SARS病原体幕后故事[J].财经,2003,.
  • 6廖怀凌.非典病原体确认为冠状病毒始末[J].南风窗,2003,5.
  • 7WIB贝弗里奇.科学研究的艺术[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.108.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部