期刊文献+

教师在行动中反思的层次与能力 被引量:20

The Levels and Capacities of Teachers' Reflection-in-Action
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课程教学领域的反思与哈贝马斯的三种认识兴趣相连,被区分为技术性反思、实践性反思和解放性反思。本研究结合舍恩所论述的反思性实践者的行动中反思过程,对专家教师与普通教师进行课堂观察并访谈,发现在教学中三种反思层次都存在,且相互角力又相互支撑与融通。专家教师在行动中反思的核心是对问题"重新框定"的能力,其卓越的行动艺术与其所拥有的三种反思层次之间的贯通力有关。 Teachers' reflection related to curriculum and teaching is usually distinguished into three levels-tech- nical,practical and emancipatory-eorresponding to Habermas' three cognitive interests.This re- search studies and compares the process of an expert teacher's reflection-in-action with that of an or- dinary teacher.Through case analyses and interviews,the researcher finds that the three levels of reflection are all important in teaching.The expert teacher's reflection-in-action is similar to what D.A.Schon describes as the reflective practitioner's knowing-in-action,in which the ability to're- frame'the situation is of vital importance.The expert teacher's art of action has a lot to do with his/ her capacities to reframe and make critical decisions among the three levels of reflection.
作者 李莉春
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期92-105,共14页 Peking University Education Review
基金 北京市教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题"教师实践性知识研究"(AIA06135)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.New York: Basic Books. 69, 276-282.
  • 2Usher et. al. (1997). Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge. London: Routledge. 143.
  • 3佐藤学.课程与教师[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.27-29.
  • 4Van Manen, M. (1995). On the Epistemology of Reflective Practice. Teachersand Teaching: theory and practice. Vol. 1 , No. 1. 33-50.
  • 5卢真金.反思性教学及其历史发展[J].全球教育展望,2001,30(2):57-63. 被引量:182
  • 6舍恩.反映回观-教育实践的个案研究[G].夏林清等译.台北:台北远流出版公司.2003:196.
  • 7哈贝马斯.哈贝马斯精粹[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2004..
  • 8Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum : Product or Praxis. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press. 12, 14, 19.
  • 9周勇.后现代文化中的课程论困境[J].全球教育展望,2003,32(2):54-57. 被引量:3
  • 10Irvin, T. S. (1999). Theory as Espoused and Practiced by a High School English Teacher: Staying with the Tried and True. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid- South Educational Research Association, Nov 17-19.

二级参考文献18

  • 1彼得·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1999..
  • 2大卫·杰弗里·史密斯.全球化与后现代教育学[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2000..
  • 3哈贝马斯.认识与兴趣[M].上海:学林出版社,1999.229,250,41,39,200-201,201.
  • 4钟启泉.课程改革与教师专业化.2002年10月19日“上海教育论坛”专题演讲.
  • 5保尔·汤普逊.过去的声音.辽宁教育出版社,2000.
  • 6小威联姆·E·多尔.后现代课程观.教育科学出版社,2000.
  • 7Bourdieu, P., et al., An Introduction of Reflexive Socialogy. The University of Chicago Press. 1992.
  • 8Doll, W. E. , Jr., Curriculum and Concept of Control, in W. Pinar(ed.), Curriculum Identities:New Visions for the Field,Garland. 1997.
  • 9Lyotard,Jean-F. ,The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press. 1984.
  • 10Lyotard,J-F., Libidinal Economy,Athlone Press. 1993.

共引文献470

同被引文献146

引证文献20

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部