期刊文献+

Biliary brush cytology:Factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology 被引量:11

Biliary brush cytology:Factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate the yield of brushing biliary strictures and the factors associated with a positive result in biliary strictures. METHODS: Data on all consecutive patients (01/02 -10/05) who were identified to have a biliary stricture and who underwent biliary brush cytology were collected. The yield of positive biliary brush cytology was evaluated and compared to results with the gold standard for diagnosis (defi ned as either defi nitive surgical histology or clinical course). Additionally,associated factors of positive results including stricture location,gender,age,mass size,length of stricture,and dilatation prior to brushing cytology were assessed. RESULTS: From 199 patients who had brushing cytology samples (10 patients were excluded due to lack of gold standard diagnosis),77 patients had positive brushing cytology (yield 41%). Variables associated with positive cytology brushing on initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were age 1.02 (1.00-1.05),mass size > 1 cm 2.22 (1.01-4.89) and length of stricture > 1 cm 3.49 (1.18-10.2). The sensitivity of biliary brushing was 61%,its specifi city 98%,the positive predictive value reached 99%,and the negative predictive value was 57%. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed a 41% positive yield from brushing cytology. The sensitivity of biliary brushing cytology in our center was 61% and the specif icity was 98%. Predictors of positive yield include older age,mass size > 1 cm,and stricture length of > 1 cm. AIM: To evaluate the yield of brushing biliary strictures and the factors associated with a positive result in biliary strictures. METHODS: Data on all consecutive patients (01/02 -10/05) who were identified to have a biliary stricture and who underwent biliary brush cytology were collected. The yield of positive biliary brush cytology was evaluated and compared to results with the gold standard for diagnosis (defined as either definitive surgical histology or clinical course). Additionally, associated factors of positive results including stricture location, gender, age, mass size, length of stricture, and dilatation prior to brushing cytology were assessed. RESULTS: From 199 patients who had brushing cytology samples (10 patients were excluded due to lack of gold standard diagnosis), 77 patients had positive brushing cytology (yield 41%). Variables associated with positive cytology brushing on initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were age 1.02 (1.00-1.05), mass size 〉 1 cm 2.22 (1.01-4.89) and length of stricture 〉 1 cm 3.49 (1.18-10.2). The sensitivity of biliary brushing was 61%, its specificity 98%, the positive predictive value reached 99%, and the negative predictive value was 57%. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed a 41% positive yield from brushing cytology. The sensitivity of biliary brushing cytology in our center was 61% and the specificity was 98%. Predictors of positive yield include older age, mass size 〉 1 cm, and stricture length of 〉 1 cm.
机构地区 St Paul's Hospital
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2008年第4期569-573,共5页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 胆汁 内窥镜检查 胰腺 细胞学 Biliary Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanc reatography Pancreas Gallbladder Ampulla
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1[1]de Bellis M,Fogel EL,Sherman S,Watkins JL,Chappo J,Younger C,Cramer H,Lehman GA.Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:176-182
  • 2[2]Ferrari Junior AP,Lichtenstein DR,Slivka A,Chang C,Carr-Locke DL.Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:140-145
  • 3[3]Foutch PG,Kerr DM,Harlan JR,Marine RK,Kummet TD,Sanowski RA.Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:791-795
  • 4[4]Foutch PG.Diagnosis of cancer by cytologic methods performed during ERCP.Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:249-252
  • 5[5]Kocjan G,Smith AN.Bile duct brushings cytology:potential pitfalls in diagnosis.Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16:358-363
  • 6[6]Kurzawinski T,Deery A,Davidson BR.Diagnostic value of cytology for biliary stricture.Br J Surg 1993; 80:414-421
  • 7[7]Kurzawinski T,Deery A,Dooley J,Dick R,Hobbs K,Davidson B.A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures.Gut 1992; 33:1675-1677
  • 8[8]Logrono R,Kurtycz DF,Molina CP,Trivedi VA,Wong JY,Block KP.Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures:the experience at 2 university hospitals.Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124:387-392
  • 9[9]McGuire DE,Venu RP,Brown RD,Etzkorn KP,Glaws WR,Abu-Hammour A.Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma:an analysis of factors influencing results.Gastrointest Endosc 19%; 44:300-304
  • 10[10]Ryan ME.Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP.Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:139-142

同被引文献69

引证文献11

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部