摘要
目的:比较奥氮平与碳酸锂对双相障碍Ⅰ型躁狂或混合性发作患者的疗效和安全性。方法:60例患者随机给予奥氮平或碳酸锂双盲治疗,奥氮平的日剂量为5~20 mg,碳酸锂的日剂量为600~1800 mg。于基线时、治疗第1,2,3,4周末,分别采用临床总体印象疾病严重度量表一双相障碍版(CGI-s-BP)、Young躁狂量表(YMRS)、简明精神病量表(BPRS)、Montgomery-(?)sberg抑郁量表(MADRS)评定疗效1次。基线和终点时进行血生化、血常规、尿常规以及心电图检查,以评价安全性。结果:无论是试验组还是对照组,治疗4周末CGI-S-BP[(2.2±1.21),(2.3±1.10)]、YMRS[(7.6±10.09),(6.7±6.79)]和BPRS[(3.8±6.53),(3.9±4.92)]得分均较治疗前[(5.4±0.77),(5.1±0.70);(33.5±8.13),(31.6±7.69);(13.5±7.41),(14.5±9.20)]有明显下降,差异非常显著(P<0.01),而两组之间在上述指标方面的差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。试验组和对照组在有效率(85.7%,84.4%)和痊愈率(82.1%,81.3%)方面的差异也无显著性(P>0.05)。两组之间不良事件的总发生率没有显著差异(P>0.05)。奥氮平治疗对心电图无明显影响。结论:奥氮平治疗双相障碍Ⅰ型障碍的疗效同碳酸锂相当,但安全性更高。
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of olanzapine with those of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania.Methods:Sixty inpatients with bipolar or mixed type mania were treated to olanzapine or lithium in a 4-week random,blinded and controlled trial.To assess the efficacy and side effects, Clinical Global Impression-BP(CGI-S-BP),Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS),Brief Psychosis Rating Scale (BPRS),and Montgomery-(?)sberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)were used before and after treatment for 1, 2,3,4 weeks.The changes of biochemical index,blood tests,urine tests and electrocardiogram were determined before and at the end of treatments.Results:After treatment with olanzapine or lithium for 4 week,the scores of CGI-S-BP were significantly decreased from(5.4±0.77)and(5.1±0.70)to(2.2±1.21)and(2.3±1.10) (P〈0.01);YMRS from(33.5±8.13)and(31.6±7.69)to(7.6±10.09)and(6.7±6.79)(P〈0.01); BPRS from(13.5±7.41)and(14.5±9.20)to(3.8±6.53)and(3.9±4.92)(P〈0.01).However,there were no significant difference between the effects of two drugs(P〉0.05).After 6-week treatment of olanzapine and lithium,the respond rate(85.7% and 84.4%)and remission rate(82.1% and 81.3%)were similar.There was no significant difference in TEAEs between two groups,and no abnormalities of electrocardiogram were found in olanzapine group.Conclusion:The efficacy of olanzapine is the same as that of lithium in the treatment of bipolar or mixed type mania,but its safety is higher.
出处
《中国新药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第1期67-70,共4页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs