期刊文献+

基于本体和云理论的不确定知识表示 被引量:2

Indifinite knowledge representation based on ontology and cloud theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 描述逻辑是本体的重要表示方式,但只能处理严格的确定性的知识,并不能处理自然界中广泛存在的模糊的和不确定的知识。通过对最基本的描述逻辑ALC进行扩展,提出了能够处理不确定知识的基于本体和云模型不确定描述逻辑:Cloud-ALC,给出了Cloud-ALC的语法和语义及其蕴涵推理关系,研究了Cloud-ALC所具有的相关性质。实例分析说明Cloud-ALC可以为扩展本体描述语言以便能够处理不确定知识提供语义支持。 Description Lgics (short for DLs) are very important for the expression of ontologies,which allow reasoning about individuals and concepts.Typically,DLs can not process the indefinite knowledge existing widely in nature.Based on the cloud model,Cloud-ALC,the extension of the important description logic ALC,is presented to deal with the indefinite knowledge.The syntax and semantic of it are defined,the properties ate studied in detail,and the techniques to solving the entailment problem are also presented.Case analysis proves that Cloud-ALC can provide a formal underpinning for the indefinite extension of ontology description languages.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期51-54,共4页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60663004) 山东省自然科学基金(the NaturalScience Foundation of Shandong Province of China under Grant No.A200621) 山东省科技计划项目基金(No.G06P07)
关键词 云模型 企业知识表示 描述逻辑 不确定性推理 clould model enterprise knowledge presentation Description Logie indifinite inference
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献97

  • 1李德毅,孟海军,史雪梅.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展,1995,32(6):15-20. 被引量:1245
  • 2I. Horrocks. DAML + OIL: A description logic for the semantic web. IEEE Bull of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering,2002, 25(1): 4~9.
  • 3I. Horrocks. DAML + OIL: A reasonable web ontology language.In: Proc. EDBT 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2287.Berlin: Springer, 2002. 2~13.
  • 4J. Hendler, D. McGuinness. The DARPA agent markup language. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2000, 15(6): 67~73.
  • 5D. Fensel, F. Harmelen, I. Horrocks, et al. OIL: An ontologyinfrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems,2001, 16(2): 38~44.
  • 6F. Baader, B. Hollunder. Embedding defaults into terminological representation systems. J. Automated Reasoning, 1995, 14 (1):149~180.
  • 7F. Baader, B. Hollunder. How to prefer more specific defaults in terminological default logic. In: Proc. International Joint Conf.Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann,1993. 669~674.
  • 8R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence,1980, 13(1): 81~132.
  • 9M. Schmidt-Schau, G. Smolka. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 48(1): 1~26.
  • 10R. Giugno, T. Lukasiewicz. P-SHOQ (D): A probabilistic extension of SHOQ(D) for probabilistic ontologies in the semantic web. Institute for Information System, Technische Wien University. Tech. Rep.: RR-1843-02-06, 2002.

共引文献1173

同被引文献58

引证文献2

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部