从《汉书》对《史记》材料的挪置比较马班的叙事手法

On Sima Qian and Ban Gu's Narrating Modes by Analyzing Materials in History of Han Dynasty Originated from Historical Records

《史记》"近于圆而神",《汉书》"近于方以智",这是马班比较研究的传统论点,但历来谈及此问题的学者都本于章学诚,很少注意到顾炎武也有相似的论点。我们从文献学的方法出发,对《汉书》和《史记》进行比较,钩稽出《汉书》对《史记》做了挪置的材料,对顾炎武的论点进行了再阐释,从叙事手法的角度重新论证了《史记》"近于圆而神"、《汉书》"近于方以智"的传统论点,使其更加充实有据。

The traditional viewpoint on Historical Records and History of Han Dynasty are different according to Zhang Xuecheng＇ s views. Except Zhang, there is another scholar, Gu Yanwu, who presents the similar view. From the angle of documentary, in contrast with Historical Records and History of Han Dynasty, the materials in History of Han Dynasty originated from Historical Records helps to reexplain Gu＇ s viewpoims. Narrating mode further clarify the traditional viewpoints.