期刊文献+

供应链上下游企业技术创新投入与收益分析 被引量:1

An Analysis of Input and Income of Technological Innovation for the Upstream and Downstream Firms in Supply Chain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章基于对①供应链上下游企业都不开展技术创新;②下游企业单独开展技术创新;③上游企业单独开展技术创新;④上下游企业都开展技术创新这四种情况的模型进行了求解与分析,比较了这四种情况下,供应链上下游企业技术创新的投入与收益、以及产品产量、销售价格和消费者剩余,得出了单独上游企业的技术创新比单独下游企业的技术创新能够给上下游企业带来更多的收益,也能给消费者带来更多的剩余,而上下游企业都开展技术创新带来的上下游企业收益和消费者剩余都是最多的。 This paper builds models to analyze the input and income of technological innovation of the upstream and downstream firms in a supply chain, and also analyzes the output volume, the sales price and the consumers' surplus of them. Through comparing the results of the above analysis, we come to the conclusion that the technological innovation done by the upstream firm alone may bring more profits to the upstream and downstream firms combined and more surplus to consumers than downstream firm alone, and that the corporate income and consumers ' surplus are the highest when upstream and downstream firms both carry out technological innovation.
出处 《组合机床与自动化加工技术》 2008年第2期99-102,106,共5页 Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70472030)
关键词 供应链 上下游企业 技术创新 投入与收益分析 supply chain up stream and downstream firms technological innovation analysis of input and income
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Claude D' Aspremont, Alexis Jacquemin. Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers [ J ]. The Ameriean Economic Review, 1988,78 ( 5 ) : 1133 - 1137.
  • 2Samiran Banerjee, Ping Lin. Downstream R&D, raising rivals'costs, and input price contracts[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003,21 : 79 - 96.
  • 3Samiran Banerjee, Ping Lin. Vertical research joint ventures [ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001, 19:285 - 302.
  • 4艾凤义,侯光明.纵向研发合作中的收益分配和成本分担机制[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):86-90. 被引量:46
  • 5刘卫民,陈继祥.国际化供应链的上游R&D补贴策略[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(1):105-107. 被引量:9

二级参考文献12

  • 1d'Aspremont C,Jacquemin A. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78 (5):1 133-1 137.
  • 2Harhoff D, Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development [J]. Management Science,1996, 42: 907-925.
  • 3Banerjee S, Lin P. Vertical research joint ventures [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2001, 19(2): 285-302.
  • 4Banerjee S, Lin P. Downstream R&D, raising rivals' costs, and input price contracts[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21(1) : 79-96.
  • 5D' Aspremont, C., Jacquemin, A., Cooperative and Noncooperative R& D in Dupoly with Spillovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1988,78:1133 - 1137.
  • 6Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I. Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartel [J] .American Economic Review, 1992,82:1293 - 1306.
  • 7Amir, R.Modelling Imperfectly Appropriable R&D via Spillovers[J]. International Journal of Inductrial Organization,2000,18:1013 - 1032.
  • 8Harhoff, D. Strategic Spillovers and Incentives for Research and Development [J], Management Science, 1996,42: 907-925.
  • 9Steurs, G. Inter - Industry R&D Spillovers: What Difference Do they Make? [J] .International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1995,13: 249 - 276.
  • 10Banerjee,S. Lin, P. Vertical research joint ventures[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001,19:285- 302.

共引文献52

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部