期刊文献+

预激综合征心电图PJ间期分析

The influence of accessory pathway conduction on PJ interval in preexcitation syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对比分析显性单旁路预激综合征导管射频消融(RFCA)术前、术后心电图,探讨预激综合征旁路前传对PJ间期的影响。方法选择RFCA治愈的显性单旁路预激综合征患者129例,根据旁路部位分为十组。分别测量各组RFCA术前、术后PR间期、QRS时间、PJ间期以及术前δ波时间。比较各组RFCA术前、术后PJ间期,术前正路传导时间(术前PR间期+δ波时间)与术后PR间期,术前正路下传除极心室时间(术前QRS时间-δ波时间)与术后QRS时间,比较术前各组δ波时间。结果(1)右后壁组、右后间隔组术前PJ间期明显短于术后[右后壁组术前(226±18)ms,术后(236±19)ms,P〈0.01;右后间隔组术前(221±18)ms,术后(238±31)ms,P〈0.05],其他各组PJ间期术前与术后比较差异均无统计学意义。(2)各组患者术前正路传导时间与术后PR间期比较,差异均无统计学意义。(3)右后壁组、右后间隔组术前正路下传除极心室时间明显短于术后QRS时间[右后壁组术前正路下传除极心室时间(79±12)ms,术后QRS时间(87±9)ms,P〈0.01);右后间隔组术前正路下传除极心室时间(70±13)ms,术后QRS时间(86±9)ms,P〈0.05],其他各组术前正路下传除极心室时间与术后QRS时间比较差异均无统计学意义。(4)右后壁组、右后间隔组δ波时间明显大于左后壁组和左后间隔组(P〈0.05)。结论预激综合征不仅不延长PJ间期,且可能缩短PJ间期,其主要取决于旁路心室端距离心室正常最后除极部位的远近及心室预激程度。 Objective To observe the influence of accessory pathway (AP) conduction on PJ interval in preexcitation syndrome patients. Methods One hundred and twenty-nine patients with dominant AP who underwent successful radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) were included. Patients were divided into 10 groups according to AP location. The PR interval,QRS duration,PJ interval and delta wave duration were measured using simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiography before and after RFCA. The PJ interval before R^A were compared with that after RFCA. The atrioventricular (AV) conduction time via AV node-His conduction system before RFCA was compared with the PR interval after RFCA. The ventricular depolarization time via AV node-His conduction system before RFCA was compared with the QRS duration after RFCA. Delta wave duration was compared between two groups. Results ( 1 )The PJ interval of fight posterior (RP) group and right postereseptal (R/S) group before RFCA were shorter than those after RFCA [RP group(226± 18) ms vs (236 ± 19 ) ms,P 〈 0.01 ,RPS group (221 ± 18) ms vs (238 ± 31 ) ms,P 〈 0.05 ]. (2)There were no significant differences between the AV conduction time via AV node-His conduction system before RFCA and the PR interval after RFCA. (3)The ventricular depolarization time via AV node-His conduction system of RP group and RPS group before RFCA was shorter than the PR interval after RFCA[RP group(79± 12) ms vs (87± 9) ms,P 〈 0.01 ;RPS group (70 ± 13) ms vs (86 ± 9) ms,P 〈 0.05 ]. (4)The delta wave duration of RP group and RPS group was longer than that of left posterior group and left posteroseptal group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion PJ interval is shortened by preexcitation syndrome. It is determined by AP location and the extent of preexcitation.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志(内科版)》 2008年第2期4-7,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
基金 辽宁省教育厅基金资助项目(20072105)
关键词 预激综合征 心电描记术 导管消融术 Preexcitation syndrome Electrocardiography Catheter ablation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Josephson ME. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology: techniques and interpretations. 3rd ed. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.
  • 2吴杰.心电图临床与自动分析的标准化问题.新概念心电图.第2版.北京:北京医科大学出版社,2002.31-35.
  • 3Chiang CE, Chen SA, Teo WS, et at. An accurate stepwise electro-cardiographic algorithm for localization of accessory pathways in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome from a comprehensive analysis of delta waves and R/S ratio during sinusrhythm. Am J Cardiol, 1995,76(1): 40-46.
  • 4刘仁光.预激综合征临床心电图诊断有关问题[J].临床心电学杂志,2003,12(1):43-48. 被引量:33
  • 5Lau EW,Ng GA,Griffith MJ. A new ECG sign of an accessory pathway in sinus rhythm: pseudo partial right bundle branch block. Heart, 1999,82 (2) : 244-245.
  • 6严衍玲,刘仁光,李占全.预激综合征对QRS波终末向量的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2004,18(6):453-455. 被引量:9
  • 7Liu S, Yuan S, Olsson SB. Conduction properties of accessory atrioventricular pathways : importance of the accessory pathway location and normal atfioventricular conduction. Scand Cardiovasc J, 2003,37(1):43-48.

二级参考文献13

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部