期刊文献+

阻塞管理中交易调整模型的统一描述及其对比分析

Unified framework and comparative analysis of transaction adjustment models in congestion management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 交易调整模型的合理构建是采用交易计划调整的阻塞消除方法实现的关键.在现有交易调整模型的基础上,提出了阻塞管理中交易调整模型的统一描述.它可以包括Pool交易模式、双边/多边交易模式及Pool+双边/多边交易模式下现有的各种交易调整模型,而且通过模型中相应参数的不同选取,可构建出新的交易调整模型,为阻塞消除方法的分析和研究提供了一个全面的模型框架.基于该模型框架,给出了比较交易调整模型的3个性能评价指标,即市场收益、市场操纵行为对市场收益的影响和市场参与者的自由选择程度.通过对现有交易调整模型的分析和评价,显示出Pool+双边/多边交易模式下的交易调整模型的性能总体上优于只有Pool交易或者双边交易模式下的交易调整模型. It is very important for the congestion relief methods based on transaction adjustment to rationally establish the transaction adjustment models.Based on the existing models,a unified framework of transaction adjustment models is proposed.This framework can not only include all kinds of existing transaction adjustment models in the pool,bilateral/multilateral and pool+bilateral/multilateral trading modes,but also the new transaction adjustment models are established by setting different parameters,and thus it provides a general model framework for analyzing and investigating the congestion relief methods.Then,based on the unified framework,the three performance indexes,i.e.,the market benefit,the impact of market manipulation on the market benefit and the choice degree of participants,are presented to compare the transaction adjustment models.The existing transaction adjustment models are evaluated,and the analysis results show that the transaction adjustment models in the pool+bilateral/multilateral trading modes are superior to those of pool or bilateral/multilateral trading modes as a whole.
作者 杨洪明
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2007年第4期49-55,共7页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70601003) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(05JJ30107)
关键词 交易调整 统一描述 对比分析 阻塞管理 电力市场 transaction adjustment unified framework comparative analysis congestion management power market
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Nayak A S,Pai M A.Congestion management in restructured power systems using an optimal power flow framework[A].Masters Thesis and Project Report[C].New York:Power Systems Engineering Research Center,2002.12-43.
  • 2[2]Marannino P,Vailati R,Zanellini F,et al.OPF tools for optimal pricing and congestion management in a two sided auction market structure[A].IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings[C].Porto Portugal,2001,1(1):10-13.
  • 3[3]Wang X,Song Y H.Advanced real-time congestion management through both pool balancing market and bilateral market[J].IEEE Power Engineering Review,2000,20(2):47-49.
  • 4[4]Gribik P R,Angelidis G A,Kovacs R R.Transmission access and pricing with multiple separate energy forward markets[J].IEEE Transaltions on Power System,1999,14(3):865-876.
  • 5[5]Singh H,Hao S,Papalexopoulos A.Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets[J].IEEE Transaltions on Power System,1998,13(2):672-680.
  • 6[6]Galiana F D,Kockar I,Franco P C.Combined pool/bilateral dispatch:Performance of trading strategies[J].IEEE Transaltions on Power System,2002,17(1):92-99.
  • 7[7]Bialek J W,Germond A,Cherkaoui R.Improving NERC transmission loading relief procedures[J].The Electricity Journal,2000,13 (5):11-19.
  • 8[8]Bompard E,Correia P,Gross G.Congestion-management schemes:a comparative analysis under a unified framework[J].IEEE Transaltions on Power System,2003,18(1):346-352.
  • 9王兴,宋永华,徐贵光.英国新电力市场模式中的平衡调度机制[J].电力系统自动化,2000,24(12):4-8. 被引量:23
  • 10[10]Christie R D,Wangensteen I.The energy market in Norway and Sweden congestion management[J].IEEE Power Engineering Review,1998,18(5):61-63.

二级参考文献3

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部