期刊文献+

数据包络分析方法在大型综合医院相对效率评价中的应用 被引量:46

Research on Evaluating the Efficiency of General Hospital in DEA Programming
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索在DEA(data envelopment analysis)评价指标体系的构建、指标的筛选及DEA方法对医院相对效率评价的应用价值方面的应用。方法运用聚类分析、相关分析、变异系数分析方法筛选用于DEA的评价指标;运用DEA对医院相对效率进行评价。结果经过三种方法筛选,最终确定了8个输入指标和6个输出指标;经过DEA分析,有19个单元为DEA无效。结论构建了与以往研究不同的,涵盖了与医院规模、质量、效益和效率相关的多指标评价体系;在DEA方法评价指标的筛选中应用多种统计学方法可使指标筛选的结果更加客观、科学、合理;DEA方法适于以诊断性评价为主的医院相对效率(效益)的综合评价。 Objective This paper is trying to search for constructing the indicatrix system of hospital efficiency evaluation, choosing the indicatrix and the application value of DEA method on the aspect of efficiency evaluation. Methods This paper uses the cluster analysis, correlation analysis and coefficient of differentiation method to choose the evaluation indicatrix of DEA method. Meanwhile, this paper uses DEA method to evaluate the efficiency of the general hospitals. Results It finally defines 8 input and 6 output indicatrix, after using three methods to choose the evaluation indicatrix of DEA method. There are 19 inefficient units in the evaluation results of DEA method. Conclusion It makes up of the multi-indicator system including the scale, quality, benefit and efficiency of the hospitals, which is different from the old ones; It apphes some statistical methods to choose the evaluation indicatrix of DEA method, which is more objective, scientific and reasonable;DEA method is suitable for evaluating the diagnosis synthesis appraisal of the relative efficiency in the hospitals.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期18-21,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
关键词 DEA 综合医院 效率 DEA General hospital Efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

  • 1李成林,陈伟志.高技术企业产权结构初探[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1995,16(1):22-25. 被引量:4
  • 2Charnes,A. , W.W.Cooper and E.Rhodes.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J].European Journal of Operational Research,1978(9):429-444.
  • 3魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法-运筹学的新领域[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987.6-33.
  • 4盛昭翰 朱乔 吴广谋.DEA理论.方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.153-168.
  • 5Ebeling W, Frommel C. Entropy and predictability of information carriers[J]. Biosystems,1998,46(4):47-55.
  • 6Zadeh LA. Fuzzy set[J]. Inform Control,1965,8(3):338-353.
  • 7Tzeng GH. Compromise solution by MCDM methods:A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. Eur J Operat Res, 2004, 156(2):445-455.
  • 8Lai YJ, Liu TY,Hwang CL. TOPSIS for MODM[J]. Eur J Operat Res,1994,76 (3):486-500.
  • 9Deng H, Yeh CH, Robert JW. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights[J]. Comput Operat Res,2000,27(10):963-973.
  • 10Herath G. Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process[J]. J Environ Manag, 2004,70(3):263-273.

共引文献127

同被引文献342

引证文献46

二级引证文献419

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部