期刊文献+

大学教师发展:实践困境和矛盾分析 被引量:26

Faculty Development:Plight of Practice and Analysis of Contradiction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学教师是大学的核心要素,大学教师的科研、教学和社会服务能力决定了大学的教育质量乃至整个高等教育的质量。从实践层面来看,大学教师的发展还存在诸多困境:培训机制、问责制、学术伦理道德等都不同程度地阻碍了大学教师的发展。在大学教师发展过程中,存在着科学研究的专业化和教学所要求的多维知识结构、教师的内在发展需求与大学组织制度缺位、大学教师职业的稳定性与竞争性的多个矛盾。对于大学教师发展过程中的实践困境和矛盾的分析有助于找到解决问题的途径。 Faculty is the core element in universities. Education qualities in universities and even in the whole higher education system are determined by the abilities of scientific research, teaching and social work of teachers. From the level of practice, there still exits a good many plights, such as mechanism of training, accountability system, academic morality etc, which block faculty development (FD) to some different extents. At the same time, during the course of faculty development, there are many contradictions, such as contradiction between the specialization of scientific research and multi -dimensional knowledge structure required by teaching, contradiction between teachers' inner development demands and the lack of university organizational system, even between the stability and the competence of faculty profession. It is help- ful to find out the way of FD by analyzing the practical plight and contradiction.
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期22-26,共5页 Teacher Education Research
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划2006年教育部重点课题(DIA060151)
关键词 大学教师发展 实践困境 faculty development plight of practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1Matthew Flinders, The politics of accountability in the modern state,Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate, 2001.
  • 2Donald E. Heller, The States and public higher education policy: affordability, access, and accountability, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
  • 3K.E.Eble & W.J.McKeachie (1985).Improving undergraduate Education through Faculty Development.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,p6.
  • 4W.H.Berquist and S.R.Phillips (1977).A Handbook for Faculty Development,Vol.2,Washington,D.C.:Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges,p326.
  • 5M.P.Ingraham.(1965).The Outer Fringe:Faculty Benefits Other than Universities and Insurance.Madison:University of Wisconsin Press,p76.
  • 6J.G.Gaff & R.D.Simpson.(1994).Faculty Development in the United States,Innovative Higher Education,Vol.18,No.3,p168.
  • 7Stephen R.Porter and Paul D.Umbach.(2001).Analyzing Faculty Workload Data Using Multilevel Modeling,Research in Higher Education,Vol.42,No.2,p171.
  • 8J.G.Gaff & R.D.Simpson.(1994).Faculty Development in the United States,Innovative Higher Education,Vol.18,No.3,p174.
  • 9http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_4/4_3/4_1.asp,2004-11-07.
  • 10菲利普·阿尔特巴赫编辑,陈舜芬等译.《21世纪美国高等教育》[M].台北:台北市高等教育出版社.2003.71.

共引文献75

同被引文献187

引证文献26

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部