期刊文献+

科技园在英国区域发展和科技创新战略框架中的作用 被引量:7

The Performance of Science Parks As Part of Framework for Development and Regional Innovation and Science in the United Kingdom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Science parks have been in existence for over 20 years in the UK. A review of these reveals that there are three groups (stakeholders) that have an interest in these projects, each of which has a variety of objectives for involvement. However, there is one common or cross cutting objective for all stakeholders which is an interest in knowledge transfer and commercialization. Over the years there have been a number studies in the UK that have looked at this common purpose and some suggest that science parks do not meet this objective. In 2003 the UK Science Park Association (UKSPA) and the UK Government’s Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Small Business Service (SBS) funded a comparative study of 876 companies both on and off science parks in an attempt to evaluate the past and future economic contribution of the UK Science Park Movement. The most significant finding and conclusion of this study was that there were significant differences in the performance of Science Park across the UK and that this performance was as a result of the economic environment in which individual parks operate. In addition, the study showed that science parks play a positive role in supporting the growth of technology - related businesses, and hence wealth creation, in the UK; they make a significant and distinct contribution to the UK’s economic infrastructure; the accommodation they provide is valued by tenants and the overall commercial performance of the companies based on them is better than similar firms located elsewhere. The broad conclusion of this study were that the effectiveness of science parks in helping tenant companies drive technology up the value chain, is dependent on a number of other external factors and this highlighted the need to develop and implement wider policies and strategies to support science parks if they are to reach their full potential as instruments of economic development. This paper reviews some of the studies on science parks and considers these in the context of both the findings of the most recent UKSPA study and some of the policies and strategies that have been developed and implemented in the UK that are concerned with the" knowledge bridge" that links knowledge generation with knowledge utilization (commercialization). Science parks have been in existence for over 20 years in the UK. A review of these reveals that there are three groups (stakeholders) that have an interest in these projects, each of which has a variety of objectives for involvement. However, there is one common or cross cutting objective for all stakeholders which is an interest in knowledge transfer and commercialization. Over the years there have been a number studies in the UK that have looked at this common purpose and some suggest that science parks do not meet this objective. In 2003 the UK Science Park Association (UKSPA) and the U K Government's Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Small Business Service (SBS) funded a comparative study of 876 companies both on and off science parks in an attempt to evaluate the past and future economic contribution of the UK Science Park Movement. The most significant finding and conclusion of this study was that there were significant differences in the performance of Science Park across the UK and that this performance was as a result of the economic environment in which individual parks operate. In addition, the study showed that science parks play a positive role in supporting the growth of technology - related businesses, and hence wealth creation, in the UK; they make a significant and distinct contribution to the UK's economic infrastructure; the accommodation they provide is valued by tenants and the overall commercial performance of the companies based on them is better than similar firms located elsewhere. The broad conclusion of this study were that the effectiveness of science parks in helping tenant companies drive technology up the value chain, is dependent on a number of other external factors and this highlighted the need to develop and implement wider policies and strategies to support science parks if they are to reach their full potential as instruments of economic development. This paper reviews some of the studies on science parks and considers these in the context of both the findings of the most recent UKSPA study and some of the policies and strategies that have been developed and implemented in the UK that are concerned with the "knowledge bridge" that links knowledge generation with knowledge utilization (commercialization).
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 2008年第1期118-126,共9页 Urban Planning International
基金 国家自然科学基金项目:开发区与城市的空间整合及规划调控研究(编号50508009)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1[1]ANGLE Technology and TSD.The Surrey Research Park-European Commission SPRINT Science Park Evaluation Programme.1996.
  • 2[2]Best M.The New Comprtitive Advantage[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001.
  • 3[3]Cooke P.The Regional Development Agency in the Knowledge Economy:Boundary Crossing for Innovation System 2003 Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association Annual Conference--"Peripheries,Centres,and Spatial Development in the New European,Jyvaskyla,Fialand,August 27 to 30 2003.
  • 4[4]CURDS 2004,Center for Urban& Regional Development Studies,University of Newcastle Upon Tyne UK,Regional Science Policy & Instruments:an Overview of British Developments,A background paper prepared for the 'strategy for success'scrutiny and Policy Development Panel North East Assembly UK 17 February 2004.
  • 5[5]DTI.Our Competitive Future:Building the Knoeledge Driven Economy December 1998 Department of Trade and Industry,1998:
  • 6[6]DT12001:science and Innovation Strategy 2001 (DTI 2001) Department of Trade Industry.
  • 7[7]DTI 2003 Competing in the golobal economy:the innovation challenge Dti December 2003.
  • 8[8]DTI and HM Treasury 2004:Science and Innovation Framework 2004-2014 paragraph 8.2-Science and Innovation across Government.
  • 9[9]Harris.R,and Trainor,M..1995,1nnovation and R&D in North Ireland Manufacturing:A Schnmpeterian Approach,Regional Studies,Vol29.7.,593-604.
  • 10[10]House of Lords Select Committee on Science and technology,3rd Reprort,Session1996-97,The Innovation-Exploitation Barrier,HL Paper62,ISBN0104062975,The Stationery Office Limited.

同被引文献100

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部