7[7]Janssen AG,Mansour K,Bos JJ,et al.Diameter of the bony lacrimal canal:normal values and values related to nasolacrimal duct obstruction:assessment with CT.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2001,22 (5):845～ 850
8[10]Nykamp SG,Scrivani PV,Pease AP.Computed tomography dacryocystography evaluation of the nasolacrimal apparatus.Vet Radiol Ultrasound,2004,45 (1):23 ～ 28
10[12]Karagulle T,Erden A,Erden I,et al.Nasolacrimal system:evaluation with gadolinium -enhanced MR dacryocystography with a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled technique.Eur Radiol,2002,12(9):2343 ～2348
5Saxena SK. A study of nasolacrimal canal in crania from Uttar Pradesh(India) [ J ]. Anthropol Anz, 1984,42 (4) :265.
6Linbery JV, Mc C. ormick SA. Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. A clinicopathologicreport and biopsy technique [ J ]. Ophthalmogy, 1986,93 (8) : 1055.
7Yazici B, Yazici Z. Anatomic position of the common can a limulus in patients with a large lacrimals ac [ J ]. Ophthal P last Recons trsurg,2008,24(2) :90-93.
8Saleh GM, Gauba V, Tsangaris P, et al. Digital subtraction decry ocys to grapy and syringing in the management of epiphora [ J ]. Orbit,2007,26 (4) :249-253.
9Amrith S, Goh PS, Wang SC. Tear flow dynamics in the human asolacrimal ducts - a pilot study using dynamic ma:aetic resonance imaging [ J ]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2005,243 (2) : 127-131.
