刍议《内经》与《周易》同源性

Discrimination on "Changes" and "Medicine"

《周易》包括《易经》和《易传》,是中国古代哲学的一个源头和精髓,而《内经》则奠定了中医学理论及中医学的发展方向。针对目前中医学术界认为的"医易同源"结论提出质疑,从《内经》中较为重要的天人相应学说、阴阳学说、五行学说出发,与《周易》的学术思想一一对比,得出二者间存在较大差异,二者同源或许言过其实。

The Books of Changes is organically composed of the Text and the Commentaries, It is the headstream and distillation of ancient Chinese philosophy. On the other hand, Internal classic establishes the outline of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） ~. This paper suspects the theory of ＂ Medicine and Changes sharing the same origin. ＂ It starts with comparing the primary contents in the Books of Changes with the three main theories in Internal Classics, namely ,＂ relevant adaptation of the human body to natural environment＂, ＂yin -yang theory＂ and ＂ the theory of five elements＂, reaching the conclusion that there are lots of differences between these two books. As a result, it is not as convictive as we thought to allege that both the Books of Changes and Internal Classics share the same origin.