期刊文献+

实验市场中的股权结构、信息与控制权收益 被引量:15

Ownership Structure, Information and Benefits of Control in the Experimental Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实验室环境下的决策过程研究可以较好地考察决策变量的行为基础和动态临界值,本文以中国股市中的股权结构为背景,在实验框架下考察了股权结构、信息披露和控制权收益的关系。文章先从理论上计算股东的夏普利值并以此代表股东控制权,再分不同设置变量来实验地考察控制权收益。结果表明:(1)股东控制权越平均,控制权收益越少;大股东与小股东形成"核"联盟的机会越多,其取得控制权的机会越少。(2)信息对控制权收益的影响主要体现在信息在联盟的形成和维持中的作用。(3)大股东夏普利值的高低和信息情况决定了联盟的方式。(4)控制权溢价并不一定就是控制权收益,也许只是大股东为防止自身利益被侵害而支付的成本。(5)信息不完全不一定是坏事,部分信息的隐含更能增加公司的分配效率。 With the rapid development of laboratory experimentation in economics and management, as well as their neighbor disciplines, behavioral approach has become as important as normative and positive approach. The behavioral foundations and dynamic thresholds of people's decision variables can only be better studied by investigating the process of subjects' decision making in the laboratory experimental context, in which we can control all the irrelevant variables as possible as we could. In accordance with the ownership structure pattern of China listed companies, this paper focuses on the relationship among ownership structure, information disclosure and benefits of control under laboratory experimentation approach. Firstly, we figure out the theoretical Shapley Value of different shareholders as the agency variable of their control right, then we study the benefits of control in various experimental treatments. Our experimental results show that: (1) The more counterbalance of the shareholder's control right, the less benefits of their control right. Accordingly, the more chance to form core alliance for the large stockholder, the less chance for them to get control rights; (2) The effect of information on benefits of control are mainly responsible for forming and maintaining the alliances; (3) The Shapley value and information condition of large stockholder determine the mode of alliances; (4) The premiums of control right may be the cost paid by large stockholder to keep their controlling position clear from other stockholders' interference than just the controlling benefits; (5) Information imperfection is not always bad, sometimes properly-designed incomplete information conditions can improve the distribution efficiency of corporations substantially. It is maybe the first experimental research in our country, which addresses the issue on the ownership structure of public corporation, so the resuits above are very constructive for us to understanding the game between various stockholders, especially the stockholders of china listed companies.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2008年第1期66-77,共12页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70672029) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(05JJD630023) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70532001) 天津市社科基金项目(TJ05-GL004) 南开大学“985工程”哲学社会科学创新基地--“中国企业管理与制度创新”研究项目资助
关键词 实验 联盟 控制权收益 股权结构 信息 Experiment Alliance Benefits of Control Ownership Structure Information
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1阿道夫A.伯利,加德纳C.米恩斯著,甘华鸣,罗锐韧,蔡如海译.现代公司与私人财产.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 2Demsetz, Harold. The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law & Economics, 1983, 26(2): 375- 390.
  • 3Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W.. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(3): 461-88.
  • 4Morck, Randall, Shleifer, Andrei, Vishny, Robert W.. Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, (20): 293-315.
  • 5Tayor S., G. Whittred. Security Design and the Allocation of Voting Rights: Evidence from the Australian IPO Market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1998, (4): 107-131.
  • 6Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1-2): 3-27.
  • 7Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer. Corporate Ownership around the World. The Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471-517.
  • 8Sanford J. Grossman, Oliver D. Hart. Takeover Bids, The FreeRider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11(1): 42-64.
  • 9Sanford J. Grossman, Oliver D. Hart. One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, (20): 175-202.
  • 10Bobert W. Hamilton. Private Sale of Control Transactions: Where We Stand Today. 36 CASE W. RES. L. REV., 1985, 248(23): 263-268.

二级参考文献159

  • 1陈朝阳.上市公司资产股权交易价格的实证分析[J].证券市场导报,1999(3):34-38. 被引量:10
  • 2陈璇,李仕明,祝小宁.公司绩效与经营者变更:上市公司政府控制权的差异[J].管理评论,2006,18(3):3-13. 被引量:9
  • 3路易斯·普特曼 兰德尔·克罗茨纳.企业的经济性质[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000..
  • 4[1]Grossman S, Hart O. Takeover Bids, the Free Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11(1): 42-69.
  • 5[2]Grossman S, Hart, O. One Share One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20(1/2): 175-202.
  • 6[3]Shleifer A, Vishny R. A Survey of Corporate Governance [J]. Journal of Finance, 1987, 52(2): 737- 783.
  • 7[4]Shleifer A, Vishny R. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(3): 461- 488.
  • 8[5]La Porta R, Lopez- de- Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corporate Ownership around in the World [J]. Journal of Finance,1999, 54(2): 471 - 517.
  • 9[6]Jensen M, Meckling W. Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.
  • 10[7]Johson S, La Porta R, Lopez- de- Silanes F, Shleifer A. Tunneling [J]. American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2):22 - 27.

共引文献685

同被引文献456

引证文献15

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部