期刊文献+

夫妻施暴者躯体虐待行为与父母养育方式的相关性研究

The relationship between the perpetraters' physical abuse behavior in couple violent and their parental nurturing styies
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨父母养育方式对夫妻暴力中男性施暴者躯体虐待行为的影响。方法采用父母养育方式评价量表(EMBU)进行病例对照研究。结果研究组与对照组比较,有较低的教育水平和较多的嗜烟者;父亲养育方式的惩罚、严厉(FE2),过分干涉(FE3),拒绝、否认(FE5)和过度保护(FE6)4个因子[分别为(17.60±4.85)分,(21.42±5.50)分,(8.43±2.74)分,(11.19±3.34)分]与对照组[(分别为(15.43±5.73)分,(19.48±5.54)分,(7.24±2.89)分,(9.90±3.16)分]比较,差异具有显著性(P〈0.05);Logistic回归分析依次进入方程的是受试者的教育程度和其父亲拒绝、否认的养育方式。结论夫妻暴力中男性施暴者躯体虐待行为与其教育程度和父亲不适当的养育方式有关。 Objective To explore the effect of parents' nurturing styles on the male perpetraters' physical abuse behavior in couple violent. Methods The case-control association study was used. 156 male samples who had physical abuse behavior to their wives were tested by the demographic data and EMBU, were compared with those of 44 normal paired controls derived from the community sample. Results The data showed that the years of school education of the study group were significantly lower than that of the normal control group, while the former had more smokers than the latter . The score of FE2, FE3, FESand FE6 of EMBU of the study group ( 17.60 ± 4.85,21.42 ± 5.50,8.43 ± 2.74 and l 1.19 ± 3.34, respectively) were statistically higher than those of the normal control group( 15.43 ± 5.73,19.48 ± 5.54,7.24 ± 2.89 and 9.90 ± 3.16, respectively) ( P 〈0.05 ). Binary Logistic Regression on the male perpetraters' physical abuse behavior showed that the educational level and the rejection and denial of fathers in EMBU were entered. Conclusion The male perpetraters' physical abuse behavior in couple violent were related to their educational level and the inadequacy nurturing styles in childhood.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2008年第2期158-159,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金 美国纽约中华医学基金会资助项目(01-749)
关键词 夫妻暴力 躯体虐待 父母养育方式 Couple violent Physical abuse Nurturing styles
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1张亚林.论家庭暴力[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(5):385-387. 被引量:26
  • 2胡佩诚.200对夫妇家庭暴力调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):171-171. 被引量:24
  • 3Straus MA. Behind Closed Doors:Violence in the American Family. New York. NY: Anchor,1980. 13-57.
  • 4American Medical Association. Diagnostic and treatment guideline on domestic violence. Arch Fam Med, 1992, 1: 39-47.
  • 5WHO. World report on violence and health. World Health Organization,2002. 6-78.
  • 6Fartuzzo J, Boruch R, Beriama A, et al. Domestic violence and children.Prevalence and risk in five major U.S. Cities. J Am Acad. Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1997,36(1): 116-112.
  • 7Dube SR. Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the lifespan. JAMA, 2001 286:3089-3096.
  • 8Chaulk R, King PA. Violence in families: assessing prevention and treatment programs. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1998.
  • 9Cole TB. Case management for domestic violence. JAMA, 1999, 282:313-514.
  • 10Flitcraft A.Learning from the paradoxes of domestic violence.JAMA,1997,277(17):1400-1401.

共引文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部