“现实的”与“哲学的”——关于《野草》的争辩

Debates on the Weed :"Realistic" and "Philosophic"

新时期以来关于鲁迅《野草》的理解明显可分为"现实的"与"哲学的"两条思路。孙玉石执著于前者,意在还原《野草》创作的原初环境,但他对"现实"的理解依然囿于某种政治观念的框架;李欧梵、汪晖力图突破这一层面,从人生哲学的高度来解读《野草》,但却陷入了西方非理性主义的陷阱;王乾坤是以生存论来解读《野草》的开启者,却未能将之贯彻到底,仍在"形下"与"形上"之间徘徊。鉴此,我们意在从鲁迅自己对"哲学"(人生诚理)的体认出发,从其自身的生存情态将自身打开,从而达及到他的作为"诗即思"的《野草》的生存哲学的理解。

Since the new era the understandings of Lu Xun ＇ s Weed can be obviously divided into two ideas - one is Realistic, and the other is Philosophic. Sun Yushi sticked to the former, aimed at reverting the original environment in which the Weed was created, but his understanding of ＂reality＂ is still limited to some political concept. On the other hand, Li Oufan and Wang Hui tried to break through this level and interpret the Weed from the philosophy of life; they were, however, plunged into a non - ra- tionalism. Wang Qiankun is the first person that interpret Weed from the view of the survival, but did not carry out this idea in the end, and wandered between ＂Pihysical＂ and ＂Metaphysical＂. Hence, we intend to start up from the own realization by Lu Xun himself of ＂philosophy＂ - which can be also be interpreted as life -justification and achieve to understand the survival philosophy of his Weed.