期刊文献+

几个甘蔗新品种在崇左蔗区的新植比较试验 被引量:2

Planting Experiment of New Sugarcane Varieties in Chongzuo Area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以粤糖94/128、园林3号、园林6号、93/102、桂糖26号、粤糖00/236和云蔗93/94七个品种,与主栽品种新台糖22号进行对比试验,观测萌芽率、分蘖率、青叶数、株高、生长速、茎径、有效茎数、蔗茎产量、甘蔗蔗糖分和含糖量,并计算综合适应指数。结果表明:新台糖22号的综合适应性能最好,桂糖26号稍次之,其余依次是园林6号、粤糖94/128、粤糖00/236、云蔗93/94、园林3号,93/102的综合适应性能最差。桂糖26号、粤糖94/128、园林6号和园林3号在水肥条件适宜、技术措施配套的情况下,可在崇左蔗区适量推广种植,粤糖00/236、云蔗93/94和93/102不宜推广种植。 Seven new sugarcane varieties were tested in comparison with ROC22 (CK) in Guangxi Chongzuo area in 2006. The investigation was undertaken in including germination rate, tillering rate, green leaves, plant height, growth speed, stem diameter, millahle stalks, cane yield, cane sugar content and sugar yield. The results showed that integrated characters of all new sugarcane varieties were lower than the CK, comparatively, Guitang 26 was better, 93/102 was worse, and the others were common. Suggestion were given that Guitang 26, Tuetang 94/128, Yuanlin 6 and Yuanlin 3 may he widely planted in Chongzuo area, Guangxi under suitable water and fertilizer condition and relevant planting techniques, whereas Yuetang 00/236, Yunzhe 93/94 and 93/102 were not suitable for planting in the area.
作者 韦衍标
出处 《中国糖料》 2008年第1期39-42,共4页 Sugar Crops of China
关键词 甘蔗 新品种 比较试验 Sugarcane New varieties Comparative trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

共引文献15

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部