期刊文献+

“法与金融”理论述评 被引量:4

Law and Finance Theory:Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法与金融学的研究作为第三代金融发展理论的组成部分,是现代金融理论研究的前沿课题,近年来已取得了较大的发展,并分为宏观法与金融理论和微观法与金融理论。"法与金融"理论认为,不同的法律起源以及由此产生法律系统的适应能力,在投资者保护方面表现各异,进而导致了不同的社会经济结果。 Law and finance theory, development theory, is the forward-posit the component part of the third generation of finance ion topic of modern financial theory. In recent years, it has achieved considerable development, and fall into macro-and micro-law and finance theories. Law and finance theory infers that those distinct legal origins and the resulting ability to adapt to the legal system behave differently in protecting investors. Then it led to a variety of socio-economic results.
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第1期5-10,共6页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 LLSV 法律 金融 LLSV law finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer and Vishny. 1998. “Law and Finance,” The Journal of Polotical Economy 106(6).
  • 2La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer and Vishny. 1997. “Legal Determinants of External Finance,” The Journal of Finance 52(3).
  • 3La Porta,Lopez-de-Silanes, Pop-Eleches and Shleifer. 2004. “Judicial Checks and Balances,” Journal of Political Economy 112.
  • 4Beck, Thorsten,Asli Demirgtic-Kunt, Ross Levine. 2003. “Law and Finance: Why does Legal Origin Matter?”Journal of Comparative Economics,Elscvier31(4).
  • 5Johnson, S. & P. Boone, A. Breach, E. Friedman. 2000. “Corporate Governance in the Asian Financial Crisis,”Journal of Financial Economics 58: 141-186.
  • 6La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer. 1999. “Corporate Ownership around the World,” The Journal of Finance 54.
  • 7Claessens, Stijn, Djankov, Simeon and Lang, Larry HP. 2000. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
  • 8La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer and Vishny. 2000. “Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World,” Journal of Finance 55.
  • 9Christian, Leuz & Dhananjay Nanda, Peter Wysocki. 2003. “Earnings arrangement and Investor Protection: An International Comparison,” Journal of Financial Economics 6.
  • 10La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer and Vishny. 2002. “Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation,” The Journal of Finance 57.

二级参考文献73

  • 1陈小悦,徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):3-11. 被引量:785
  • 2梁杰,王璇,李进中.现代公司治理结构与会计舞弊关系的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(6):47-51. 被引量:120
  • 3.《三角债问题仍然严重》[N].《人民日报》第5版,2002年5月15日.
  • 4高善文.《三角债的成因分析》(手稿)[M].中国人民银行,2000年..
  • 5王立彦,刘军霞.A-H股公司财务信息差异与治理特征[J].中国证券业研究,2003,(1).
  • 6Daniel Berkowitz, Katharina Pistor, and Jean-Francois Richard, Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect. European Economic Review, vol. 47, no. 1 (2003), pp. 165-195 .
  • 7Franklin Allen, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China. Working paper,University of Pennsylvania, 2002; La Porta, Ratael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, no. 6 (1998), pp. 1113-1155.
  • 8Minxin Pei, Does Legal Reform Protect Economic Transactions? Commercial Disputes in China. In Peter Murrell(ed.), Assessing the Value of Law in Transition Countries, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001, pp.180-210.
  • 9William Afford, The More Law, the More…Measuring Legal Reform in the People' s Republic of China. Working Paper no. 59, Stanford Center for International Development, Stanford University, 2000.
  • 10Ross Garnaut, Ligang Song, Yang Yao, and Xiaolu Wang, The Emerging Private Enterprise in China. Canberra:The National University of Australia Press, 2000.

共引文献1129

同被引文献63

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部