暴力作案刑事责任能力评定量表在广州地区的应用

Application of criminal responsibility rating scale for violence in Guangzhou

目的探讨谢斌等编制的暴力作案刑事责任能力评定量表（CRRS—V）在广州地区责任能力3级评定中的应用。方法采用CRRS—V回顾性评定刑事责任能力鉴定392例，进一步检验该量表的信效度及其与原专家鉴定结论的一致性。结果CRRS．V的分半信度为0．9271，分量表与总量表之间、各条目与总量表之间及大部分条目之间的相关均有统计学意义（r为0．099～0．982，P〈0．001）。据CRRS—V的参考划界分分组，无、限定和完全责任能力3组间及两两间总量表分的差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0．001）。CRRS—V评定和专家鉴定两种责任能力分级方法的结果一致性较好（Kappa=0．702，P〈0．05），以量表分级结果建立判别函数，无、限定、完全责任能力3级的回代判别正确率分别为93．8％、94．4％和91．0％。结论CRRS—V在广州地区使用的信效度良好，具有推广的应用价值。

Objective To investigate the application of the criminal responsibility rating scale for violence （CRRS-V） developed by Xie Bin in the assessment of three-level criminal responsibility in Guangzhou. Methods Crimial responsibility of 392 cases were evaluated retrospectively with CRRS-V, of which reliability, validity and coherence to the judgment of the pri- mary forensic experts were tested. Results The split-half reliability of CRRS-V was 0. 9271. The inter-correlation of score on each item and each item＇ s correlation with the total score on the scale were all statistically significant （ r = 0. 099 - 0. 982, P 〈 0. 05） . When the cases were graded into three groups （ no, diminished and all responsibility group） according to reference division score of CRRS-V, the differnces of scores among three groups and within groups were significant （ P 〈 0. 001 ） . The coherence of the scale＇ s assessment and the experts＇ judgment on the grade of responsibility was great （ Kappa = 0. 702, P 〈 0..05） . Establishing discriminant function by the above three grading method of responsibility, classification results suggested that 93.8%, 94. 4% and 91.0% of the original groups were correct, respectively. Conclusion CRRS-V has good reliability and validity when used in Guangzhou. The results suggested that the scale can be used as the reference of the assessment of threelevel criminal responsibility.