期刊文献+

国外学术机构评价的研究进展 被引量:10

International Advancement for the Evaluation of Academic Institution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章介绍了国外有关学术机构评价的一些重要研究进展,以欧洲发达国家为主,其核心是按照科研绩效来给研究机构分配研究经费。在相关的研究文献中,M Henkel概括了英国高等教育评鉴(RAE)的作用,及其给英国大学、学术界带来的正负双面影响。A Geuna和B R Martin对欧洲及亚太地区12个国家评价大学科研绩效的方法进行比较,其中尤其关注英国的做法,考察按科研绩效给大学拨款的利弊。土耳其的FSenses则从发展中国家的视角,提出了自己的观点。 This paper introduces some advancement internationally for the evaluation of academic institution, which mainly focuses on the distribution of research funds according to research performance in the developed Europe and some other nations. As for valuable literatures, M Henkel, A Geuna and B R Martin examined the double edged his own consequence of research funding according to performance assessment, and F Senses in Turkey provides consideration.
作者 朱少强
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第1期72-75,共4页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"我国人文社会科学研究评价体系的构建与实证分析"(05AZX004)
关键词 科研评价 学术机构 人文社会科学 research evaluation academic institution humanities and social science
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1MARY HENKEL The Modernisation of Research Evaluation: The Case of the Uk [ J]. Higher Education. 1999 (38) : 105 - 122.
  • 2ALDO GEUNA , BEN R MARTIN. University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison [ J ]. Minerva. 2003, 41 : 277 - 304.
  • 3FIKRET SENSES. Difficulties and Trade - Offs In Performance Evaluation in Social Sciences - A Turkish Perspective. ERC Working Paper in Economic [ EB/OL]. (2003 -03 - 11 )[ 2007 -01 -02 ]. http://www, erc. metu. edu. tr/men- u/series03/0311, pdf.
  • 4P BOURKE. Evaluation University Research: the British Research Assessment Exercise and Australian Practice [ R ]. Commissioned Report No. 56. Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training, 1997).

同被引文献266

引证文献10

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部