期刊文献+

阅读理解中语用推理能力研究 被引量:1

Research into the Pragmatic Reasoning Ability in Reading Comprehension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对非英语专业学生语用推理能力进行调查研究,采用阅读测试形式并对数据进行定量分析。发现在五类推理题中,状态类和态度类推理最难,其次为主旨类、目的类和细节类推理。分析了影响语用推理能力的因素,并提出了阅读课中有助于语用推理能力培养的教学启示。 This paper makes a research into the non-Enghsh major students pragmatic reasoning ability. The method is to take reading comprehension test and then to make quantitative analysis of the data. Of the five groups of reasoning questions, state group and attitude group are the most difficult. The following are motive, purpose and detail groups. The factors influencing the ability are analyzed in this paper and some suggestion is made on helping to train students' reasoning ability in reading comprehension course.
作者 林健
出处 《山东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期78-81,共4页 Journal of Shandong University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 非英语专业 阅读理解 语用推理能力 non- English major reading comprehension pragmatic reasoning ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1ComprehensionProcessesinReading,1990.
  • 2Bloom ,C,Fletcher ,C.Anon -lineassessmentofcausalreasoningduringcomprehensionMemory and Cognition,1990.
  • 3Clark,H.InferencesincomprehensionBasicProcessesinReading :PerceptionandComprehension,1977.
  • 4Garnham,A.Futuredirections,1994.
  • 5HandbookofPsycholinguistics,1994.
  • 6Kess,J .F.Psycholinguistics,1992.
  • 7Kintsch ,W,VanDijk ,T .A.TowardamodeloftextcomprehensionandproductionPsychological Review,1978.
  • 8O’Brien,e .J.TheroleofcausalconnectionsintheretrievaloftextMemory and Cognition,1987.
  • 9Rayner,K.Comprehensionprocesses:introductionComprehensionProcessesinReading,1990.
  • 10InferencesinTextProcessing,1985.

共引文献17

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部